14
guarantees. He deemed that the fact that Juan Humberto Sánchez bore arms and
wore a uniform constituted flagrancy. However, when he analyzed Annex 1 of the
application and stated that he had not signed that document, he clarified that the
information contained in it established that Juan Humberto Sánchez was accused of
crimes against private property. Nevertheless, he was released, as the villagers who
had complained against him did not show up. Then he stated that he did not know
why, if he bore weapons of an unauthorized caliber, he was released the following
day, and he emphasized that a person who uses a rifle to frighten people, assault
people and rob them is dangerous.
The armed forces learned, through the media and through the investigation carried
out the by commander of the Tenth Battalion, the characteristics of the persons who
had participated in the second detention, and they reached the conclusion that it was
carried out by people with their faces covered, wearing beards, who were dirty and
wore boots, for which reason they concluded that no members of the armed forces
were involved in the detention.
They had no information on participation by officer Ángel Belisario Hernández in the
murder, and the latter was discharged in 1996, the year in which the witness left his
post, and up to that date no arrest warrant had been received. As he stated to “La
Prensa,” there are documents and information on the non-participation of the armed
forces in the murder. That information can be requested from the file, as he does
not remember having transferred it to a criminal investigation and there was no
request in that regard.
He cannot recall whether on July 28, 1992 he ordered a military helicopter to go to
the area of Santo Domingo, to take Juan José Vijil to Tegucigalpa.
e)
Testimony of Enmanuel Flores Mejía, former commander of the
Tenth Infantry Battalion
In 1992, he was the commander of the Tenth Infantry Battalion, which had its
headquarters in the city of Marcala, Department of La Paz. His functions included
command over a border unit, which was supposed to act in support of the
population. Second lieutenant Ángel Belisario Hernández was under his command in
1992.
He had information that there were Salvadoran refugees in the area, as well as
armed people wearing uniforms, but no orders were given to act against those
groups. He does not know who conducted the counterinsurgency work, or whether
said units existed, and he does not know what “territorial forces” were.
He recalls that he received a radio message from second lieutenant Ángel Belisario
Hernández, who informed him that an individual illegally wearing military uniform
and bearing an AK-47 rifle, who also had AK-47 and caliber 22 ammunition, had
been detained in the village of Santo Domingo, municipality of Colomoncagua, in
response to a request by the mayor and a local judge, due to complaints by certain
inhabitants of Santo Domingo. He said that the detainee was taken to the military
post and released the following day at 9:30 a.m., because no one came to accuse
him “out of fear.” He stated that the document showed to him at the hearing,
which is Annex 1, was false.
Seleccionar párrafo de destino3
Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos