5 investigations against her. Additionally, Ecuador must initiate prompt and effective investigations, guaranteeing their fairness, as well as that of investigators and judges, notwithstanding the many problems that the Ecuadorian Judiciary currently faces, and ii. the State is obliged to investigate the specific facts of the Court's decision diligently and within a reasonable term, as well as to produce detailed and updated reports on the fulfillment of said measure. The excessively long time elapsed implies a serious risk of not being able to retrieve the evidence that would help to identify, prosecute and punish the perpetrators of the facts. On the other hand, the complaints were not filed with the Government Attorney’s Office that corresponded to the place where the facts had taken place (Guayaquil), but with the State Solicitor General, in Quito, which obstructs the investigation process, insofar as the evidence is mainly located in a city different from the forum before which the case is pending. b) as regards to the written statement wherein the State is to acknowledge international responsibility and apologize to the victims: the State has not reported on the publication of the formal written statement regarding the facts mentioned in the Judgment prepared by high-level state authorities. c) as regards to the education and training program: the State has not reported on the fulfillment of this reparation measure. This program has not been implemented; no contact has even been established with organizations of the civil society to coordinate the creation of the committee. d) as regards to the publication of the extract of the Judgment delivered by the Court in the Official Gazette, and in newspapers with national circulation in Ecuador and France: i. the publication in the Official Registry of Ecuador that the State submitted to the Court does not comply with the aforementioned guideline, inasmuch as only operative paragraphs 1 to 10 were published; ii. in relation to the publication of the extract of the Judgment in France, they suggest that the State should ask for a quotation in another newspaper called Libération. Additionally, they suggest that the State should propose other newspapers that meet the requirement of wide circulation in France, especially in the area where Mr. Daniel David Tibi resides, and provide the corresponding quotations, and iii. it has been more than ten months since the State informed that it would instruct its Embassy in France to take the necessary steps to comply with this part of the Judgment; however, it has failed to do so. e) as regards to payment of compensations: i. the State has fallen behind with the payment of compensations and they expect it to make said payment as soon as possible; ii. it is necessary for the State to remember that the compensation includes future expenses for psychological and medical treatment of Mr. Tibi. Consequently, lack of payment has, among