28 111. The Constitutional Chamber ordered the water contamination problem to be solved within a period of one month.157 It noted that in order to ascertain that it was indeed solved, the Costa Rican Institute of Aqueducts and Sewers shall coordinate with the National Water Laboratory to test the water of CAI La Reforma prison and provide a report thereof to the Chamber.158 The Constitutional Chamber also concluded that the suspensions of water service “are disproportionate and affect, therefore, the health of those deprived of liberty.”159 It ordered the authorities to provide potable water service continually within a period of three months, “that is to say, for 24 hours a day seven days a week.”160 112. In a communication received on December 25, 2012, Mr. Rojas filed a petition for amparo relief with the Constitutional Chamber. He requested for the third time that his right to health be ensured inasmuch as he did not have access to medical services. He claimed that he suffers from high fevers, blood in his stool and diarrhea. He specifically contended that the prison overcrowding problem made his condition worse.161 113. On December 27, 2012, the Constitutional Chamber ordered the authorities “to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that Rafael Antonio Rojas Madrigal receives the medical attention he requires to adequately treat his ailment (…) either in the Institutional Care Center [the prison] itself or at a hospital facility.”162 114. On January 18, 2013, the Constitutional Chamber granted the petition for amparo relief filed by Mr. Rojas, received on December 25, 2012.163 The Constitutional Chamber found it to be proven fact that on September 7, 2011, Mr. Rojas was diagnosed with hemorrhoids and was prescribed a treatment.164 It noted that because medical attention had just been sought for him with the filing for amparo, it “constitutes a violation of his right to health.”165 Accordingly, the Constitutional Chamber 157 Annex 70. Decision No. 2012012846 of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, dated September 14, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of December 21, 2012. 158 Annex 70. Decision No. 2012012846 of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, dated September 14, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of December 21, 2012. 159 Annex 70. Decision No. 2012012846 of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, dated September 14, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of December 21, 2012. 160 Annex 70. Decision No. 2012012846 of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, dated September 14, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of December 21, 2012. 161 Annex 71. Submission of amparo petition of Mr. Rojas Madrigal, dated December 25, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of April 22, 2013. 162 Annex 72. Decision of the Constitutional Chamber, dated December 27, 2012. Annex to petitioner’s submission of April 22, 2013. 163 Annex 73. Decision of the Constitutional Chamber, dated January 18, 2013. Annex to petitioner’s submission of April 22, 2013. 164 Annex 73. Decision of the Constitutional Chamber, dated January 18, 2013. Annex to petitioner’s submission of April 22, 2013. 165 Annex 73. Decision of the Constitutional Chamber, dated January 18, 2013. Annex to petitioner’s submission of April 22, 2013.