18 satisfactory level of compliance with judgments and orders of the Court by the States Party to the American Convention. This is so because a case is not concluded until the judgment has been fully complied, in spite of the very high level of partial compliance with judgments. This situation could be reversed if the States Party would always furnish the Court timely with information it requests from them about the compliance with judgments and provisional measures. 29. Below is a list of all the contentious cases and provisional measures submitted to the Court up to February 2005, specifying which cases have been closed and which provisional measures have been rescinded. Contentious Cases40 Case Name 1. Case of Velasquez Rodriguez 2. Case of Fairen Garbi and Solís Corrales 3. Case of Godinez Cruz 4. Case of Aloeboetoe et al. 5. Case of Gangaram Panday 6. Case of Genie Lacayo 7. Case of Cayara 8. Case of Maqueda 9. Case of “The Last Temptation of Christ” (Olmedo Bustos et al. v. Chile) 10. Case of Alfonso Martin del Campo Dodd Year of Submission Status Honduras 1986 Closed Honduras 1986 Closed Honduras Suriname 1986 1990 Closed Closed Suriname 1990 Closed Nicaragua Peru Argentina 1994 1992 1994 Closed Closed Closed Chile 1999 Closed Mexico 2003 Closed Peru 1990 12. Case of Caballero Delgado y Santana Colombia 1992 13. Case of El Amparo Venezuela 1994 14. Caso of Loayza Tamayo Peru 1995 15. Case of Castillo Páez Peru 1995 11. Case of Neira Alegría et al. 40 Respondent Government Monitoring compliance with judgment Monitoring compliance with judgment Monitoring compliance with judgment Monitoring compliance with judgment Monitoring compliance with judgment Out of all the contentious cases heard by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 13.33% have been closed, 30.66% are currently pending before the Court and 56% are in the stage of overseeing compliance with judgment.