4 execution of the Court’s judgment “through the allocation of funds pursuant to Article 7 of Law 27775.” Finally, the Ministry of Justice had informed that the Special Fund for the Administration of Money Obtained Illegally in detriment of the State (hereinafter “FEDADOI”) informed that it was not authorized to attend to the requests of money to comply with the payment of the reparations ordered by judgments of the InterAmerican Court. 8. The brief of March 11, 2005, through which Mrs. Herlinda Ibáñez viuda de Aguirre Roca informed that on March 7, 2005 she had received a check from the Ministry of Justice for an amount of S/322,000.00 new soles, which corresponds to the third part of the amount due by the State. Likewise, she stated her dissatisfaction before the State’s omission to pay the totality of the compensatory amount and the lack of determination of Peru regarding the amount for interests and the date on which the pending payments would be made. 9. The brief of March 15, 2005, through which the State informed that the Ministry of Justice had paid Mrs. Delia Revoredo Marsano and Pilar Vega Alvear viuda de Rey the amount of S/ 322,000.00 new soles, and that payment to the successors of Mr. Manuel Aguirre Roca was in process. On the other hand, on February 21, 2005 the Ministry of Justice had requested the General Director of Administration that it set the date on which payment of the remaining balance corresponding to the arrears of salary would be made, to which it responded that it could not state the date on which it would comply with the remaining balance, since there must be a prior coordination between the National Council of Human Rights and the General Office of Economy and Development regarding budget availability. Therefore, on February 23, 2005 a request was made to the Ministry of Economy and Development so that it would coordinate with the General Office of Economy and Development in order to comply with the remaining balance of the back pay and to inform of the actions carried out. Besides, on November 11, 2004 the Ministry of Justice requested to the Ministry of Economy and Finances that it adopt the measures necessary to comply with the execution of the Court’s judgment, through the allocation of funds. 10. The brief of April 1, 2005, through which Mrs. Herlinda Ibáñez viuda de Aguirre Roca stated that on March 7, 2005 she had received a check from the Ministry of Justice for the amount of S/ 322,000.00 new soles “as an advance payment corresponding to the third part of the compensatory amount set by the Constitutional Court itself and accepted by the State on April 18, 2001.” Besides, she reiterated her lack of conformity with having received the amount mentioned, since “now four years after the judgment was issued, the State […] had unilaterally decided to pay a third of the compensatory amount […], avoiding besides all reference to the interests earned due to the delay in the compliance of the judgment.” 11. The brief of April 11, 2005, through which Mrs. Delia Revoredo Marsano de Mur stated, inter alia, that: a) in what refers to the investigation of the facts, it is possible to punish the members of congress for the constitutional infraction of removing Senior Judges of the Constitutional Court for opinions issued in the exercise of their position, and b) regarding payment of the balance of the compensation plus interests, Law 27775 states that the funds required to comply with the judgments