4 Commission approved the report in question on February 20, 1991, and decided to submit it to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights pursuant to Articles 51 of the American Convention on Human Rights and 50 of the Regulations of the ICHR.’ 2. That on Friday, June 7, 1991, the Court received the file by courier service. 3. That on Wednesday, June 12, 1991, the Executive Secretary of the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights telephoned the Secretary of the Court to inform him that Mr. Luis Jiménez, the Commission’s attorney, would be travelling to the Court as soon as possible to discuss the possible withdrawal of the case(s). Mr. Jiménez arrived at the Court on June 18, 1991. 4. That by note of June 20, 1991 (attached), received at the Secretariat on the 24th of that month, the Inter-American Commission stated that ‘it ha[d] decided for the time being to withdraw the case from the Court, in order to reconsider it and possibly present it again....’ The Secretariat of the Court acknowledged receipt of this note, after consulting with the Permanent Commission. 5. 11. No minutes of the full Court exist on the subject. The public hearing was held at the seat of the Court on June 24, 1992. There appeared before the Court for the Government of Peru: Alonso Esquivel-Cornejo, Agent Julio Vega-Erausquin, Ambassador Eduardo Barandiarán, Minister Counselor of the Diplomatic Mission of Peru to Costa Rica Manuel Ubillús-Tolentino; for the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: W. Michael Reisman, Delegate Edith Márquez-Rodríguez, Delegate Jill Hedges, Advisor Wilder Tyler, Advisor Juan E. Méndez, Advisor José Miguel Vivanco, Advisor Marcela Briceño-Donn, Advisor. 12. At the hearing, the Commission supplied the information requested by the Government (supra 9) regarding the session of the Commission of October 27, 1991, which approved Resolution 1/91 and the second Report Nº 29/91. Delegate Edith Márquez-Rodríguez stated that