118 that it was established “to create a direct link for assistance in finding [victims], and for support among the victims, their next of kin and the competent state institutions.” Lastly, the State indicated that the purpose of the Comprehensive Public Security Program is to coordinate the security forces of the three branches of government in the state of Chihuahua. 487. With regard to the federal jurisdiction, the Coordination and Liaison Subcommission for the Prevention and Eradication of Violence against Women in Ciudad Juárez (hereinafter the “SCEPEVM”) was created on June 6, 2003, to “examine the situation of violence against women in Ciudad Juárez and to propose a comprehensive public policy, with courses of action in different areas to benefit the girls and women of Ciudad Juárez.”469 488. On July 22, 2003, in Ciudad Juárez, the SCEPEVM announced the Federal Government’s Program of Collaborative Actions to Prevent and Eliminate Violence against the Women of Ciudad Juárez _(hereinafter the “40-point Program”). This 40point Program “was designed to deal with the multiple causes of the disappearances and murders of women in Ciudad Juárez,” and “its activities were based on three main areas derived from the different recommendations received: access to justice and prevention of crime; social promotion, and the human rights of women.” 470 489. The Tribunal notes that the 40-point Program is based on three fundamental principles: (i) coordination; (ii) social participation, and (iii) transparency, and it has three strategic focal points: (i) provision of justice and prevention of crime, with 15 actions; (ii) social promotion, with 14 actions, and (iii) human rights of women, with 11 actions.471 490. The 40-point Program was monitored by the Ciudad Juárez Commission (supra para. 127), created on February 18, 2004, as an unconcentrated organ of the Secreteriat of Government, dependant on the Federal Executive. The Ciudad Juárez Commission began to operate at the end of 2003;472 its activities focused on four areas of work: (i) victim support; (ii) truth and justice; (iii) public policies with a gender perspective, and (iv) strengthening the social fabric.473 To carry out its functions, the Ciudad Juárez Commission had two offices, one in Ciudad Juárez and the other in Mexico City.474 The Court observes that, in June 2009, the Ciudad Juárez Commission Chihuahua, Primer Informe, June 3, 2004, case file of attachments to the application, volume X, attachment 79, folios 3103 and 3098). 469 Cf. Report on Mexico produced by CEDAW, supra note 64, folios 1940 and 1970, and Comisión para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres en Ciudad Juárez, Tercer informe de gestión, supra note 101, folio 9030. 470 Cf. Report on Mexico produced by CEDAW, supra note 64, folios 1938 to 1940; Office of the Special Prosecutor for the Investigation of Crimes related to the Murders of Women in Ciudad Juárez, Informe Final, supra note 87, folios 7449 and 7450. 471 Cf. Comisión para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres en Ciudad Juárez, Tercer informe de gestión, supra note 101, folios 9156 to 9292, and Report on Mexico produced by CEDAW, supra note 64, folios 1938 to 1940. 472 Cf. Decree creating the Commission to Prevent and Eliminate Violence against Women in Ciudad Juárez as an unconcentrated administrative body of the Secretariat of Government, published in the Federation’s Official Gazette on February 18, 2004 (case file of attachments to the the final written arguments of the State, volume XLIX, attachment 7, folios 17403 and 17404), and Comisión para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres en Ciudad Juárez, Primer Informe de Gestión, supra note 67, folio 8690. 473 Cf. Comisión para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres en Ciudad Juárez, Primer Informe de Gestión, supra note 67, folio 8708. 474 Cf. Comisión para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres en Ciudad Juárez, Primer Informe de Gestión, supra note 67, folio 8707.