personal liberty, and the guarantees of due process and judicial protection, could characterize a violation of the rights guaranteed in Articles 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 25, considered together with Article 1(1), of the American Convention. Since these aspects of the petition are not manifestly without a basis or grounds, the Commission considers that the requirements established in Articles 47(b) and (c) of the American Convention have been satisfied. 35. The Commission concludes that it is competent to consider the complaints filed by the petitioners regarding the alleged violation of Articles 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 25, considered together with Article 1(1) of the American Convention, to the detriment of Oscar Iván Tabares Toro and his family, and that they are admissible, in accordance with the requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. V. CONCLUSION 36. The Commission concludes that it is competent to consider this matter and that the petition is admissible, pursuant to Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. On the basis of the factual and legal arguments set forth in this report, and without prejudging the merits of the matter, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To declare the present case admissible, as it pertains to possible violations of Articles 1(1), 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To notify the parties of this decision. 3. To continue with an analysis of the merits of the case. 4. To publish this decision and include it in its Annual Report to the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed at the headquarters of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C., on the 13th day of October, 2005. (Signed): Clare K. Roberts, President; Susana Villarán, First Vice-President; Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Second Vice-President; Evelio Fernández Arévalos, José Zalaquett, Freddy Gutiérrez, and Florentín Meléndez, Commissioners.