51 of Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez. Likewise, the State did not deny the relationship between the victim and Ana Luisa Vargas Soto, reason for which this Tribunal considers that she was his partner at the time of the facts. Finally, this Tribunal has not found sufficient evidentiary elements to establish that a meaningful infringement was produced to Mrs. Norma Estela Bustillo as a consequence of the facts of the present case. 138. In what refers to the child Zara Beatris Bustillo Rivera, this Court points out that, due to her condition of a minor, the presence of her father was essential for her full development. As a consequence of the extrajudicial killing of Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, she has grown up without a father figure. Regarding Ana Luisa Vargas Soto, partner of Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, this Tribunal, in consideration of the violent circumstances of the arrest and extrajudicial killing of her partner, when he was under the custody of state authorities, it concludes that they have caused her suffering and pain. This Court considers that the State is responsible for the breach of the mental and moral integrity of Zara Beatris Bustillo Rivera and Ana Luisa Vargas Soto. * * * 139. The previous considerations lead the Court to conclude that the State is responsible for the violation of the right to humane treatment enshrined in Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of said treaty, in detriment of the next of kin of Marco Antonio Servellón García, Messrs. Reyes Servellón Santos, father, Bricelda Aide García Lobo, mother, and Marja Ibeth Castro García, sister; of the next of kin of Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, Messrs. Manases Betancourth Núñez, father, Hilda Estebana Hernández López, mother, Zara Beatris Bustillo Rivera, daughter, and Ana Luisa Vargas Soto, partner, and of the sister of Orlando Álvarez Ríos, Mrs. Dilcia Álvarez Ríos. IX VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 8(1) AND 8(2), 7(6) AND 25(1) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION, IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) OF THE SAME (Right to a Fair Trial, Personal Liberty, Judicial Protection, and Obligation to Respect Rights) 140. The Court in Chapter VI concluded in light of the State’s acknowledgment of its international responsibility, that it violated Articles 7(6), 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, in detriment of Marco Antonio Servellón García, Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, Orlando Álvarez Ríos, and Diomedes Obed García Sánchez, for not having guaranteed an effective protection through the writ of habeas corpus, and that the State violated Article 8(2) of the Convention for not having respected the principle of presumption of innocence, in detriment of the mentioned victims. Likewise, the Tribunal admitted the violation of Articles 8 and 25 of the Convention, in detriment of the next of kin of Marco Antonio Servellón García, Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, Orlando Álvarez Ríos, and Diomedes Obed García Sánchez for the lack of an adequate investigation of the case. In consideration of said assent, the Court will not summarize the arguments presented by the parties. However, the Court determined with regard to Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention that there was still controversy with regard to the non-compliance of Article 8 of the