58 presented by the Commission and by the representatives and the State’s consideration regarding the reparations in order to determine, first of all, who the beneficiaries of the reparations are, in order to later order the measures of reparation of the material and moral damages, the measures of satisfaction and non-repetition and, finally, that regarding costs and expenses. 165. The Court goes on now to summarize the arguments of the Inter-American Commission, the representatives, and the State regarding the reparations. Arguments of the Commission: 166. The Commission stated, inter alia, the following: a) Beneficiaries The right to reparation in the terms of Article 63(1) of the convention vests in the victim Marco Antonio Servellón García and his next of kin, specifically: Reyes Servellón Santos, father; Bricelda Aide García Lobo, mother; Marja Ibeth Castro García, Pablo Servellón García, and Héctor Vicente Castro García, siblings; the victim Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez and his next of kin, specifically: Manases Betancourth Núñez, father; Hilda Estebana Hernández López, mother; Juan Carlos Betancourth Hernández, Manaces Betancourt Aguilar, Emma Aracely Betancourth Aguilar, Enma Aracely Betancourth Abarca, and Lilian María Betancourt Álvarez siblings; Ana Luisa Vargas Soto, partner; Norma Estela Bustillo Rivera, mother of his daughter, and Zara Beatris Bustillo Rivera, daughter; the victim Orlando Álvarez Ríos and his next of kin, specifically: Concepción Álvarez, father; Antonia Ríos, mother, and Dilcia Álvarez Ríos, sister. On the date of the presentation of the application the Commission did not identify the beneficiaries of the reparations due to Diomedes Obed García Sánchez. b) Pecuniary damage It requested that the Court determine that the victims receive fair and prompt reparation for the violations established in virtue of the pecuniary damages caused, taking into account international standards. c) Non-pecuniary damage In consideration of the suffering undergone by the victims’ next of kin due to the lack of a diligent investigation of the facts and the corresponding punishment of those responsible, among other damages, it requested that the Court set in equity a compensatory amount for that concept. d) Other forms of reparation It requested that the Court order the State to: i) identify, prosecute, and criminally punish the perpetrators and planners of the arrests, tortures, and subsequent extrajudicial killings of the victims;