67 US$10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America) for Orlando Álvarez Ríos, in the concept of loss of income. The compensations previously set must be delivered to the victims’ next of kin, pursuant to that stated in paragraphs 171 and 172 of this Judgment. 177. Having analyzed the information received by the parties, the facts of the case, and its jurisprudence, the Court observes that despite that the receipts of expenses were not presented, it can be assumed that the next of kin of Marco Antonio Servellón García, Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, and Orlando Álvarez Ríos incurred in different burial expenses due to their deaths, which is pursuant with the Tribunal’s constant jurisprudence.105 Therefore, the Court considers is appropriate to set, in equity, the amount of US$1,500.00 (one thousand five hundred dollars of the United States of America) as compensation for the concept of consequential damages, for each of the victims. Said amount must be delivered to each of the following persons: Bricelda Aide García Lobo, Hilda Estebana Hernández López, and Dilcia Álvarez Ríos, respectively. 178. In what refers to Diomedes Obed García Sánchez, pursuant to that stated (supra para. 79(24)), at the time of his death he resided in a “room at a welfare house for minors in street situations, administered by Mr. Carlos Jorge Mahomar Marzuca”, from which it can be concluded that his next of kin did not incur in any expense due to his death, reason for which this Court considers that it should dismiss this aspect with regard to him. C) Non-Pecuniary Damage 179. Non-pecuniary damages may include suffering and affliction, detriment to very significant personal values, as well as non-pecuniary alterations in the conditions of existence of a victim. Since it is not possible to assign a precise monetary equivalent to non-pecuniary damages, for the purposes of a comprehensive reparation to the victims, it can only be the object of compensation in two forms. First, through payment of an amount of money or delivery of goods or services that can be estimated in monetary terms, which the Tribunal will establish through reasonable application of judicial discretion and equity. And, second, through acts or works which are public in their scope or effects, which among other effects have that of acknowledging the victim’s dignity and avoiding the repetition of the violations.106 180. International jurisprudence has repeatedly established that the judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation.107 In the case sub judice, in consideration of the suffering caused to Marco Antonio Servellón García, Rony Alexis Betancourth Vásquez, Orlando Álvarez Ríos, and Diomedes Obed García Sánchez, and that also caused suffering to some of their next of kin, the change in their conditions of existence, and other consequences of a non-pecuniary nature, the Court considers it 105 Cfr. Case of Ximenes Lopes, supra note 3, para. 226; and Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 63, para. 207. 106 Cfr. Case of Montero Aranguren et al., supra note 12, para. 130; Case of Ximenes Lopes, supra note 3, para. 227; and Case of the Ituango Massacres, supra note 3, para. 383. 107 Cfr. Case of Montero Aranguren et al., supra note 12, para. 131; Case of Ximenes Lopes, supra note 3, para. 236; and Case of the Ituango Massacres, supra note 3, para. 387.