2 d) to Isaac Alonso-Cantoral-Benavides, in the form and under the conditions provided for in paragraph 62 of [this] Judgment, the sum of US$ 5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency. e) to José Antonio Cantoral-Benavides, in the form and under the conditions provided for in paragraph 62 of [this] Judgment, the sum of US$ 3,000.00 (three thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency. 3. That the State must pay the victims’ representatives the sum of US$ 8,000.00 (eight thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency as reimbursement of legal costs and expenses, in the form and under the conditions provided for in paragraph 87 of [this] Judgment. 4. That through the procedures established by its domestic laws, the State must reverse the verdict of conviction that the Peruvian Supreme Court delivered against Luis Alberto CantoralBenavides, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 77 of this […] Judgment. 5. That the State must nullify any judicial, administrative, criminal or police proceedings that may have been started against Luis Alberto Cantoral-Benavides, in connection with the events described in the instant case and must expunge the corresponding records, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 78 of this […] Judgment. 6. That the State must provide Luis Alberto Cantoral-Benavides with a scholarship for higher or university studies, in order to cover the costs of a degree in the profession of his choosing and his living expenses for the duration of such studies, at an educational institution of recognized academic excellence to be mutually chosen by the victim or his representatives and the State, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 80 of this […] Judgment. 7. That the State must publish once in the Official Gazette and in another newspaper of national circulation, the operative paragraphs of the Judgment on the merits rendered on August 18, 2000 and make a public apology to acknowledge its responsibility and to prevent the repetition of the facts described in the instant case, pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 79 and 81 of this […] Judgment. 8. That the State must provide medical and psychological treatment in Peru to Gladys Benavides-López, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 51 (e) of this […] Judgment. 9. That the State must conduct an investigation into the facts described in the instant case, in order to identify and punish those responsible for them, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 70 of this […] Judgment. […] 12. That as from the date of notification of this Judgment, the State must submit a report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights every six months on the measures adopted to comply with its provisions. […] 3. Paragraph 97 of the Judgment on reparations (supra Having Seen clause 2), which provides that “[s]hould the State default on its obligation, it shall pay interest on the sums due at the banking interest rate in effect in Peru for overdue payments.” 4. The Orders of the Court of November 27, 2003 and November 17, 2004 on monitoring compliance with Judgment. 5. The Order of the then President of the Court of December 14, 2007, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission”), the Republic of Peru (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”) and the representatives of the victim and of his next of kin (hereinafter “the representatives”) were convened to a private hearing to be held at the seat of the Court on February 1, 2008. (Book 4, folio 1084) 6. The private hearing on monitoring compliance with Judgment held on February 1, 2008 during the LXXVIII Regular Session of the Court, wherein the State, the InterAmerican Commission, Luis Alberto Cantoral-Benavides, and the representatives referred to the measures pending compliance as ordered in the instant case.