7 31. Notes CDH-11,273/359, CDH-11,273/360, CDH-11,273/361, CDH11,273/362 and CDH-11,273/363 of February 26, 2003, in which the Secretariat, on the instructions of the whole Court, informed the parties that: the State must set up a trust fund in favor of Micaela Suárez Ramadán, which implie[d] that the State must cover any costs generated by this trust fund. Likewise, that, as the Court had decided in the judgments on reparations and interpretation of the judgment on reparations, the trust fund in favor of the minor, Micaela Suárez Ramadán, should not be subject to any tax or charge whatsoever. 32. Notes CDH-11,273/364, CDH-11,273/365, CDH-11,273/366, CDH11,273/367 and CDH-11,273/368, of October 10, 2003, in which the Secretariat, on the instructions of the Court, advised the parties that: a) According to the different briefs forwarded to the Court by the State of Ecuador, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the representatives of the victims and their next of kin, the fine imposed on Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero was not enforced, and his name was eliminated from the Register of the National Council of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (first operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of January 20, 1999); b) According to the information forwarded by the parties in this case, it appears that the payment ordered in favor of Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero and Margarita Ramadán Burbano (subparagraph (a) and (b) of the second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of January 20, 1999) has been made; c) The payment ordered in favor of the minor, Micaela Suárez Ramadán, by setting up a trust fund, as indicated by this Court in its judgment on reparations of January 20, 1999, in its judgment on interpretation of the judgment on reparations of May 29, 1999, and in its Order of December 4, 2001, is still pending. The State should provide the Court with information on whether this trust fund has been set up; d) According to the information forwarded by the parties in this case, it appears that payment of the costs and expenses ordered in favor of Alejandro Ponce Villacís and Richard Wilson (third operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of January 20, 1999) has been made; and e) The investigation and punishment of the persons responsible for the human rights violations declared by the Court is still pending (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on merits of November 12,1997). Owing to the above, the Secretariat requested the State, the Commission, and the representative of the victim and his next of kin to present a report on the matters pending compliance by October 27, 2003, at the latest, as well as any comments they had on the matters that appeared to have been complied with fully. 33. The brief of October 24, 2003, in which the Inter-American Commission responded to the Court’s request (supra thirty-first having seen paragraph). In this respect, it indicated that the only matter pending compliance in this case was “the setting up of the trust fund in favor of the minor, Micaela Suárez Ramadán” and “the