Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Huilca-Tecse v. Peru Judgment of March 3, 2005 (Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the Case of Huilca Tecse, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the InterAmerican Court”) composed of the following judges: Sergio García Ramírez, President Alirio Abreu Burelli, Vice President Oliver Jackman, Judge Antônio A. Cançado Trindade, Judge Cecilia Medina Quiroga, Judge Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge, and Diego García-Sayán, Judge; also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Articles 29, 31, 53(2), 55, 56, 57 and 58 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”)1, and Article 63(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”), delivers this judgment. I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE 1. On March 12, 2004, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) filed before the Inter-American Court an application against the State of Peru (hereinafter “the 1 This judgment is delivered under the Rules of Procedure adopted by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights at its forty-ninth regular session in an order of November 24, 2000, which entered into force on June 1, 2001, and under the partial reform adopted by the Court at its sixty-first regular session by an order of November 25, 2003, in force since January 1, 2004.