69 164. In this section, the Court will determine those measures of satisfaction, which seek to repair the non-pecuniary damage that does not have a pecuniary dimension, and also establish measures with a public dimension or repercussion. These measures seek, inter alia, to acknowledge the dignity of the victims or to transmit a message of official reproof for the human rights violations in question, and also to avoid the repetition of violations such as those in the instant case.128 Arguments of the Commission 165. The Inter-American Commission requested the Court to order a series of measures as other forms of reparation. They include the following measures of satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition: a) As part of the reparation, the victim must be reincorporated into her work as a physician with at least the level and responsibilities she had when she was detained, and with recognition of the corresponding benefits; and b) The State must organize a public act with an impact on the victim’s professional activities, as a measure of moral satisfaction, given that, during the trial in which she was prosecuted and convicted, the medical act was criminalized, which “seriously affected her relations with her professional association.” Arguments of the victim’s representatives 166. The victim’s representatives requested the following measures of satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition; a) The victim’s reincorporation into her employment and the recognition of the years of unlawful detention for the effects of her seniority and other work-related rights; b) The guarantee of a fair trial for the victim; c) Since the deprivation of the victim’s liberty was the result of a series of unlawful acts, the reparation should include her release; d) The State should vindicate the alleged victim publicly before Peruvian society and before the medical profession, and the judgment delivered by the Court should be published in an official newspaper of the State, and also in a daily newspaper with national circulation; and e) An investigation should be conducted and those responsible for the violations declared by the Court should be punished, because the investigation of the facts and the punishment of those responsible is a State obligation whenever human rights have been violated. In this regard, a State that leaves human rights violations unpunished would also be failing to comply with the general obligation to guarantee the free and full exercise of the rights to all persons subject to its jurisdiction. 128 Cf. Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 1, para. 310; Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 1, para. 208; and Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri brothers, supra note 27, para. 223.