23 Valdemir Quispealaya Vilcapoma,” which indicated that the address that appeared in the database RENIEC of Mr. Quispealaya did not exist, and that he could not be located.84 87. On June 27, 2008, the National Police of Peru presented a report to the Provincial Prosecutor of Huancayo that concluded that it had not been possible to establish the alleged commission of an offense “since it was not possible to locate the pertinent parties to the present investigation as it is detailed in the present document,” 85 it was impossible to locate the property that appeared in the RENIEC database for Mr. Quispealaya, and the number did not exist, and the neighbors claimed not to know that person. 86 Similarly, the police record indicated that “it has not been possible to determine the injuries suffered by the victim in the year 2001 because according to information sent by the Medical-legal Division of Huancayo, Valdemir Quispealaya was not submitted to evaluation by medical-legal specialists in that year.87 88. On October 17, 2008, the First Provincial Criminal Prosecutor of Huancayo resolved that there were no grounds for formalizing a criminal complaint in the preliminary investigation against Juan Hilaquita Quispe, because it had not been possible to locate Mr. Valdemir Quispealaya since the address indicated in the database RENIEC did not belong to him. Furthermore, because the crime was that of injuries, a medical-legal certificate was necessary to establish the period of disability and the medical attention or that a principal organ of the body had been damaged.88 This resolution was notified on October 28, 2008 to the procedural residence of Mr. Quispealaya and was received by Haydee Quispealaya Vilcapoma, sister of Valdemir Quispealaya Vilcapoma.89 In March of 2009, the case file was definitively closed.90 89. On August 19, 2009, the Permanent War Council of the Second Judicial Zone of the Army resolved to close definitively the case file against noncommissioned officer of the Army Juan Hilaquita Quispe for the crime of abuse of authority, and it ordered that the corresponding notices be made in the respective books and registers.91 84 Annex 35. Part No. S/N-VIII-DIRTEPOL-RPJ-DIVICAJ-DEINCRI-HYO, June 23, 2008, signed by Instructor. Annex to the State’s communication of May 2, 2013. 85 Annex 32. Part No. 262-VIII-DIRTEPOL-RPNPJ-DIVIC-DEINCRI-HYO of June 27, 2008. Annex to the State’s communication of June 26, 2009. 86 Annex 32. Part No. 262-VIII-DIRTEPOL-RPNPJ-DIVIC-DEINCRI-HYO of June 27, 2008. Annex to the State’s communication of June 26, 2009. 87 Annex 32. Part No. 262-VIII-DIRTEPOL-RPNPJ-DIVIC-DEINCRI-HYO of June 27, 2008. Annex to the State’s communication of June 26, 2009. 88 Annex 27. Resolution No. 284-2008, Investigation No. 2007-707, of October 27, 2008, Office of the Attorney General, First Criminal Public Prosecutor of Huancayo. Annex to the State’s communication of February 25, 2009. 89 Annex 28. Proof of Notification, First Criminal Public Prosecutor of Huancayo, Resolution 284. Annex to the State’s communication of February 25, 2009. 90 Annex 33. Office of the Attorney General, First Criminal Public Prosecutor of Huancayo, Notice No. 449-2009-MP1ra.FPP-HYO. Annex to the State’s communication of February 25, 2009. 91 Annex 36. Case No. 12000-2002-0007, Resolution of August 18, 2009, signed by President of the War Council of the Second Judicial Area of the Army, Gabriel Hebert Idme Dávila, Crl SJE, among others. Annex to the State’s communication of June 3, 2013.