12 p. the proceedings of the case before the Inter-American Commission18. 43. The documents presented by the Commission were not disputed or questioned, nor was their authenticity put in doubt, therefore the Court accepts them as valid. * 44. * * In contesting the application, Peru presented copies of three documents on: a. the complaint against the members of the Supreme Council of Military Justice19; and b. the complaint against the members of the Pubic Law Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of Lima20. 45. The documents listed, presented by the State, were not contested nor objected to, neither was their authenticity put in doubt, so that the Court accepts them as valid. * * * 46. On November 27, 1998, the State presented copies of 29 documents, which, it said, were related to matters of competence in the instant case21. 18. Cfr. copy of the document with the complaint addressed by Carmen Judith Cardó Guarderas de Cesti to the Secretary General (sic) of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; copy of official communication No. 7-5-M/243 of the Permanent Representation of Peru before the Organization of American States; request for precautionary measures issued by the Inter-American Commission on April 25, 1997; copy of report No. 45/97, issued by the Inter-American Commission; proceeding before the Inter-American Commission. 19. Cfr. copy of the decision of the Supreme Court of Justice of May 19, 1997; copy of the decision of the Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of July 30, 1997. 20. Cfr. copy of the decision of the Supervisory Office for Judges of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of July 25, 1997 in investigation No. 25-97. 21. Cfr. copy of the decision of the Public Law Chamber of February 12, 1997 in proceedings No. 33597; copy of report No. 1732-97-2a.FSP-MP of the Council of War of the Army’s First Judicial Zone of April 28, 1997; copy of the decision of the Criminal Chamber of June 27, 1997; copy of the decision of the Public Law Chamber of Lima of December 13, 1996; copy of opinion No. 1805-97-1FSP-MP of the Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Ayacucho of April 28, 1997; copy of the decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of June 27, 1997; copy of the decision of July 15, 1997, the author is not identified; copy of the official communication signed by the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Supreme Council of Military Justice on June 16, 1997, opinion No. 731, case No. 014-V-97; copy of the opinion signed by the Auditor General of the Supreme Court of Military Justice of July 4, 1997, opinion No. 1465, case No. 014-V-97; copy of the decision of the Supreme Court of Justice of November 18, 1997; copy of the decision of the First Transitory Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of August 7, 1997; copy of opinion No. 2606-97-1 FSP-MP issued by the Supreme Criminal Prosecutor of the Office of the First Supreme Criminal Prosecutor on June 23, 1997; copy of opinion No. 2526-97-2FSP-MP, issued by the Supreme Prosecutor of the Office of the Second Supreme Criminal Prosecutor on July 1, 1997; copy of the decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of August 19, 1997; copy of the decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of September 2, 1997; copy of opinion No. 2514-97-2FSP-MP, issued by the Deputy Supreme Prosecutor in charge of the Office of the Second Supreme Criminal Prosecutor on August 7, 1997; copy of opinion No. 3389-97-1FSP/MP, issued by the Supreme Criminal Prosecutor of the Office of the First Supreme Criminal Prosecutor on September 5,