48 obliged to comply with it. Consequently, the Court considers that the State must execute the habeas corpus decision issued by the Public Law Chamber of Lima on February 12, 1997. 194. Regarding the Commission’s second claim, the Court considers that the proceeding against Gustavo Cesti Hurtado under the military justice system was irregular. The Court has already declared, in this judgment, that the proceeding to which Gustavo Cesti Hurtado was submitted is a violation of his right to be heard by a competent tribunal, under Article 8.1 of the Convention (supra 151). Based on the foregoing, the Court considers that the proceeding against Gustavo Cesti Hurtado under the military justice system is incompatible with the Convention, so that it considers it in order to rule that the State must annul this proceeding and all the effects derived from it. 195. With regard to the Commission’s third claim, the Court considers that the possible publication, at the cost of the State, of communiqués in which “it is made clear that the victim should not be considered guilty of committing any crime in view of the irregularity of the proceeding to which he was submitted”, represents a measure of reparation to be considered during the corresponding stage. 196. As for the Commission’s fourth claim, the Court considers that reparation of the consequences of the violation of the specific rights in the instant case is in order; this should include a fair compensation and the payment of any expenses that the victim incurred as a result of measures relating to this proceeding. 197. With regard to the Commission’s fifth claim, the Court considers that the consequences on the assets of Gustavo Cesti Hurtado due to his detention, prosecution and conviction, in particular, the embargo on his property, is a matter to be considered at the reparations stage. 198. In order to decide on reparations, the Court will require further information and evidence in addition to that which has been provided; accordingly, it orders that the corresponding procedural stage should be opened, and to this effect, authorizes its President to duly adopt any necessary measures. 199. Therefore, XVIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS THE COURT, DECIDES unanimously 1. to rule that the Peruvian State violated Articles 7.6 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights with regard to Gustavo Adolfo Cesti Hurtado, in the terms established in paragraphs 123 to 133 of this judgment, and to order that the decision of the Chamber of Public Law of Lima on the petition for habeas corpus filed by Gustavo Adolfo Cesti Hurtado, of February 12, 1997, should be complied with;