113 also victims of the attack to the criminal center. The pregnant women who lived through the attack experimented an additional psychological suffering, since besides having seen their own physical integrity injured, they had feelings on anguish, despair, and fear for the lives of their children. The pregnant inmates that have been identified before this Court are Mrs. Eva Challco, who approximately one month after the attack had her son Said Gabriel Challco Hurtado; Vicenta Genua López, who was five months pregnant; and Sabina Quispe Rojas, who was eight months pregnant (supra para. 197(57)). In this sense, besides the protection granted by Article 5 of the American Convention, it is necessary to point out that Article 7 of the Convention of Belem do Pará expressly states that the States must ensure that the state authorities and agents abstain from any action or practice of violence against women. 293. Based on the aforementioned, this Tribunal considers that the State is responsible for the violation of the right to humane treatment of the inmates that were injured during the events of May 6 to 9, 1992, which constituted a violation to Article 5 of the American Convention. Likewise, the Court considers that, in the circumstances of the present case, the totality of the acts of aggression and the conditions in which the State deliberately puy the inmates (those that died and those that survived) during the days of the attack, which caused all of them a serious psychological and emotional suffering, constituted a psychological torture carried out in offense of all the members of the group, with violation of Articles 5(1) and 5(2) of the American Convention, and 1, 6, and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. Besides, this Court considers that the violation to the right to humane treatment of Mrs. Eva Challco, Sabina Quispe Rojas, and Vicenta Genua López was exacerbated by the fact that they were pregnant, thus the acts of violence had a greater effect on them. Likewise, the Court considers that the State is responsible for the acts of torture inflicted on Julia Marlene Olivos Peña, in violation of Article 5(2) of the American Convention and of Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the InterAmerican Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. 2) Treatments received by the inmates after May 9, 1992 and during their transfer to other criminal centers and to hospitals 294. The inhuman conditions in which the majority of the inmates had to remain once the attack of May 9, 1992 had concluded have been proven (supra para 197(42)). It has also been proven that on May 10, 1992 the former President of Peru, Alberto Fujimori Fujimori, was at the Miguel Castro Castro Prison and walked among the inmates lying face down on the ground of the courtyards of said establishment (supra para. 197(43)), directly verifying the conditions in which they were in. 295. The Court finds it especially gross that the inmates that were injured and kept in the areas of the mentioned criminal center known as “no man’s land” and “admissions” did not receive medical attention (supra para. 197(42)). The State had the duty to offer them the medical attention required, considering that it was the direct guarantor of their rights. 296. It has also been proven that a minority of the inmates were transferred to the Police Sanity Hospital on May 9, 1992 (supra para. 197(44)) and that during their transfers they suffered new breaches to the physical, psychic, and moral integrity. They were transferred in overcrowded conditions and they were beaten by the police