9 December 30, 2005, in “El Comercio” —a national coverage daily (supra Having Seen clause No. 3(c)). 12. That the State submitted evidence of payments made to the beneficiaries entitled to them, as ordered by this Tribunal as compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages, including the deposit of sums in a banking investment in favor of minor Nora Emely Gómez Peralta, as well as payments of costs and expenses (supra Having Seen clause No. 3(f)). Furthermore, the then representative of the victims’ next of kin admitted the fact that the State had complied with this obligation (supra Having Seen clause No. 4(b)). 13. That, therefore, the State has complied with the obligation: a) to perform a public act of acknowledgement of its responsibility in connection with the facts of this case and as apology to the victims (Operative Paragraph No. 10 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004) (supra Having Seen clauses No. 3(b) and 8(b)); b) to publish —for one day— in the Official Newspaper and in another national coverage daily, the chapter of that Judgment on poven facts, without the respective footnotes, and the operative paragraphs thereof (Operative Paragraph No. 11 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004) (supra Having Seen clauses No. 3(c) and 8(c)); and c) to pay the victims’ next of kin the amounts ordered as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, including the deposit of sums in a banking investment in favor of the minor Nora Emely Gómez Peralta, as well as costs and expenses (Operative Paragraphs No. 14, 15, 16 and 17 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004) (supra Having Seen clauses No. 3(f), 4(a), 4(b), 6 and 8(f)). 14. That the Court deems it indispensable that the State furnish additional information on the following points, in order to determine whether they have been complied with effectively and in full: a) the obligation to effectively investigate the facts of the present case, with the aim of identifying, trying, and punishing all the perpetrators of the violations committed against Rafael Samuel and Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri (Operative Paragraph No. 9 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004); b) the obligation to officially name an educational center in the province of El Callao after Rafael Samuel Gómez Paquiyauri and Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri, in a public ceremony and in the presence of the victims’ next of kin (Operative Paragraph No. 12 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004); and c) the duty to establish a scholarship up to university level, in favor of Nora Emely Gómez Peralta and to facilitate her registry as the daughter of Rafael Samuel Gómez Paquiyauri (Operative Paragraph No. 13 of the Judgment of July 8, 2004). 15. That the victims and their representatives have requested that the Court take part in a dispute between Ms. Mónica Feria Tinta, former representative of the