8 30. On April 4, 2003, Manrique Mejía, Ivanor Alonso, Juan O. Sanjur, Fernando Dimas, Miguel Prado, Andrés Guerrero, Rafael Tait Yepes, Estebana Nash and Marina Villalobos forwarded a brief and its attachments, in which they submitted their comments on the State’s brief of February 27, 2003, (supra para. 26 and infra para. 57). 31. On April 4, 2003, Miguel González presented an amicus curiae brief concerning compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 32. On April 7, 2003, the Commission submitted its comments on the State’s brief of February 27, 2003, (supra para. 26 and infra para. 55), and on April 10, 2003, it forwarded the attachments to this brief with comments. 33. On April 7, 2003, Domingo De Gracia Cedeño presented two briefs with the comments of Fernando Del Río Gaona, José Santamaría Saucedo and himself to the State’s brief of February 27, 2003, (supra para. 26 and infra para. 57). On April 8, 2003, he forwarded the originals of these two briefs and their attachments. 34. On April 21, 2003, Juan O. Sanjur sent an e-mail in which he referred to compliance with the judgment delivered by the Court on February 2, 2001. 35. On April 22, 2003, the State presented a copy of the documents called “releases,” as requested by the Court in the sixth and tenth operative paragraphs of the Order of November 22, 2002 (supra para. 21). 36. On May 23, 2003, Juan O. Sanjur sent an e-mail concerning compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 37. On June 6, 2003, la Corte issued a third Order on compliance with judgment, in which it decided: 1. To maintain the decisions made in its Order of November 22, 2002, and therefore the measures of reparation decided in the judgment of February 2, 2001, must be complied with as ordered by the Court in that Order on compliance with judgment. 2. That the State must present, by June 30, 2003, at the latest, a detailed report indicating all the progress made in compliance with the reparations ordered by this Court, as requested by the Court in the tenth operative paragraph of the Order of November 22, 2002. 3. That, when the State [has] forward[ed] this detailed report on compliance with judgment, the victims or their legal representatives and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights must submit their comments on this report within three months of receiving it, as indicated in the eleventh operative paragraph of the Order of November 22, 2002. 4. That it w[ould] continue monitoring full compliance with the judgment of February 2, 2001. 38. On July 3, 2003, on the instructions of the President, the Secretariat requested the State to present forthwith the detailed report on progress in compliance with the reparations ordered by the Court, since the time limit for its presentation had expired on June 30, 2003 (supra para. 37).