14 and exceptional and aimed only at protecting special legal interests, related to the functions that the law confers upon the armed forces.10 26. That the Commission and the representatives (supra Having Seen clauses No. 14, 17, 18 and 20) have reported serious acts of violence, allegedly by paramilitary groups, members of other irregular armed groups as well as by Army officers against the beneficiaries. Given the special circumstances of the instant case, and the general situation of the domestic armed conflict, it is necessary that the State immediately adopt measures to adequately prohibit, deter and punish the aforesaid criminal activity.11 27. That given the severity of the situation facing the members of the Communities, as evidenced by the latest incidents reported by the representatives and the Commission, it is necessary to request the State once again to promptly and effectively adopt all such measures as may be necessary to ensure the full exercise of the right to life and to humane treatment of the members of the Community protected by these provisional measures. 28. That the State is under the obligation to investigate the facts that led to the adoption and maintenance of these provisional measures in order to identify the perpetrators and punish them accordingly. THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of the authority vested in it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 25 and 29 of the Court Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To reiterate to the State the need to maintain the measures adopted and to immediately implement such measures as may be necessary to effectively protect the life and the right to humane treatment of all the members of the Community Council of Jiguamiandó and the families of Curbaradó, as set forth in the Orders of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of March 6, 2003, November 17, 2004, and March 15, 2005. 2. To reiterate to the State to continue investigating the facts that led to the adoption and maintenance of these provisional measures in order to identify the perpetrators and punish them accordingly and, in particular, to investigate and find the person or persons responsible for the death of Mr. Orlando Valencia and Mr. Alfonso Ibáñez. 10 Cf. Case of Palamara Iribarne. Judgment of November 22, 2005. Series C No. para. Case of the “Mapiripán Massacre”, supra note 1, para. Case of Lori Berenson-Mejía. Judgment of November 25, 2004. Series C No. para. and Case of 19 Tradesmen. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 1para.165. 11 Cf. Matter of the Peace Community of San José de Apartadó, supra note 1, Considering clause No. 21; Matter of the Communities of Jiguamiandó and Curbaradó, supra note 1, Considering clause No. 18; and Case of 19 Tradesmen. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 109, para. 122.