5 6. The Court will consider the general status of compliance with its January 31, 2001 Judgment, as well as with its November 27, 2003 Order and the instant Order, once it receives the respective information on the measures with respect to which compliance is pending. NOW THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, exercising its authority to oversee compliance with its decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, FINDS: 1. That it will continue to oversee compliance with the points currently pending compliance in the instant case, namely: f) investigation to identify and punish the persons responsible for the human rights violations committed against the victims in this case; and g) payment of the back pay and other benefits due, according to domestic legislation, to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano. AND DECIDES: 1. To order the State to take such measures as may be necessary to put into effect and promptly comply with those points currently pending compliance that were ordered by the Court in the January 31, 2001 Judgment, as well as the provisions of the November 27, 2003 Order and the instant Order, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To order the State to fix and pay, in accordance with the domestic legislation most favorable to the victims and respecting due process guarantees, the interest due from the time it incurred in arrears regarding payment of the back pay and other benefits of Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano. 3. To ask the State to submit a detailed report, no later than January 31, 2005, on the current status of investigations to identify and punish the persons responsible for the human rights violations committed against the victims in this case –as well as regarding steps taken to pay the back pay, other benefits and interest due, according to domestic legislation, to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and operative paragraph 4; and Case of Godínez-Cruz. Interpretation of the Judgment on Compensation (Art. 67 American Convention on Human Rights). August 17, 1990 Judgment. Series C No. 10, para. 40, operative paragraph 4.