31 89(30) On March 3, 1998, six54 dismissed employees filed a “constitutional complaint” against the justices of the Constitutional Court, Francisco Javier Acosta Sánchez, President, Ricardo Nugent López Chávez, José García Marcelo and Luis Díaz Valverde, for the offense of malfeasance “for having delivered the judgment [of November 24, 1997] against the clear and express text of the law, for having cited inexistent evidence and false facts, and for having based themselves on alleged or derogated laws.”55 The result of this complaint does not appear in the file. Facts subsequent to the administrative and judicial measures 89(31) After the alleged victims had filed recourses at the administrative and judicial level, and following the installation of the transition Government in 2000 (supra para. 89(6)), laws and administrative provisions were issued ordering a review of the collective dismissals in order to provide the employees dismissed from the public sector the possibility of claiming their rights (infra paras. 89(32) to 89(37)) . 89(32) In this context, Act No. 27487 was issued on June 21, 2001, which established the following: Article 1. Decree Law No. 26093 […,] Act No. 25536[, …] and any other specific norms that authorize collective dismissals under reorganization processes are annulled. […] Article 3. Within 15 calendar days of the date on which this law comes into force, public institutions and agencies […] shall establish Special Committees composed of representatives of the institution or agency and of the employees, responsible for reviewing the collective dismissals of employees under the personnel evaluation procedure conducted under Decree Law No. 26093 or in reorganization processes authorized by a specific law. Within 45 calendar days of their installation, the Special Committees shall prepare a report containing the list of the employees who were dismissed irregularly, if there are any, and also the recommendations and suggestions to be implemented by the Head of the sector or local government.56 […] 89(33) Supreme Decrees 021 and 022-2001-TR established the “terms of reference for the composition and operation of the Special Committees responsible for reviewing the collective dismissals in the public sector.”57 Among them, the Special Committee responsible for reviewing the collective dismissals of congressional personnel under Act No. 27487 was established (supra para. 89(32)) and, in its report of December 20, 2001, it concluded inter alia, that: […] The 1992 and 1993 processes of administrative streamlining and of reorganization and streamlining were implemented in compliance with specific norms. 54 Mónica Alvarado Suárez, Rosario Zapata Zapata, Margarita Ramírez Granados, Cecilia Echevarría Suárez, María Huaraca Soto and Adolfo Fernández Saré. 55 Cf. impeachment of four justices of the Constitutional Court of March 3, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application, tome I, appendix 23, folios 752 and 766). 56 Cf. Act No. 27487, of June 21, 2001, published on June 23, 2001, derogating Decree Law No. 26093 and authorizing the establishment of committees to review the collective dismissals in the public sector (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 4, tome 4, folio 2649). 57 Cf. supreme decrees 021 and 022-2001-TR of July 4 and 15, 2001, respectively (file of useful evidence presented by the State, folios 4383 to 4389).