4 6. To reiterate to the State that it must allow the petitioners to participate in the planning and implementation of the measures of protection and that, in general, it must informed of progress regarding the measures decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 7. To call upon the State to inform the Inter-American Court of Human Rights about the measures it ha[d] adopted to comply with the Order by June 15, 2004, at the latest. . 8. To ask the beneficiaries of the provisional measures or their representatives to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, within 15 days from when they receive the report by the State, whatever comments they deem[ed] pertinent. 9. To ask the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit to the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, within 20 days of when they receive the report by the State, whatever comments they deem[ed] pertinent. 10. To order the State, in addition to the report referred to in operative paragraph seven, to continue informing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, every two months, on the provisional measures adopted, and to call upon the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to present its comments on these reports within six weeks of receiving them. This Court also ask[ed] the beneficiaries of the provisional measures or their representatives to continue submitting their comments on said reports within four weeks of when they receive them. […] 6. The July 9, 2004 brief in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) submitted to the Inter-American Court, pursuant to Articles 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”), 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”) and 74 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, a request for expansion of provisional measures in the Luisiana Ríos et al. case, in favor of all the journalists, management and other workers at Radio Caracas Televisión (hereinafter “RCTV”) who are in its facilities or are associated with that journalistic endeavor. The original brief with said request for expansion and its annexes was received by the Secretariat of the Court on July 16, 2004. 7. The grounds given by the Commission in its request for expansion of provisional measures (supra Having Seen 6), summarized as follows: a) on June 3, 2004 the National Electoral Council announced that they had sufficient signatures to hold a Presidential recall referendum, and this led to a number of violent commotions in various points of downtown Caracas by groups identifying themselves as followers of the President of the Republic. These disturbances led to the death of one person, at least two persons wounded, and attacks against the offices of the private media El Nacional, Así es la Noticia, and RCTV. The Metropolitan Mayor’s Office was also attacked, and several vehicles were set on fire; b) based on information supplied by the petitioners, a group of hooded individuals met on June 3, 2004 in front of the head office of RCTV. Even though there were two officers of the Dirección de los Servicios de Inteligencia y Prevención (DISIP) nearby, they made no inquiry into the presence of said group. The hooded individuals attacked the offices of RCTV with stones and firearms, some of them high caliber ones, and aimed their shots at those who looked out from the building that is the head office of

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos