16 of Foreign Relations, whereby the Comité de Impulso de Medidas Provisionales (Committee for the Implementation of Provisional Measures) had been created (supra Having Seen clauses 4, 5 and 6). In this respect, the Court observes that the State has not explained the actions it is currently carrying out to create a new adequate coordination mechanism for an effective joint planning of the implementation of these measures. 15. That as regards the background information submitted by the representatives in the instant case, as well as the observations submitted by the Commission, it is prima facie evident that the lives and personal integrity of Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre's four children are under threat (supra Having Seen clauses 5, 6, 9 and 10). 16. That the situation of Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre's four children should still be regarded as one of extreme gravity and urgency. Protection through provisional measures is necessary to avoid irreparable damage to said persons' rights to life and personal integrity. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate, once the conditions set forth in Article 63(2) of the Convention are met, to ratify the President's Order and instruct the State to extend the provisional measures to Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre's children, in order to protect their rights to life and personal integrity. 17. That the Commission and the representatives have informed the Court that the threats and harassment suffered by Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre and her four children have forced them to leave the Dominican Republic, by reason of which this Tribunal deems it necessary that the State create due conditions for those people to return to their homes6 and ensure that said beneficiaries of measures do not face any threats or other sources of fear that may prevent them from continuing to live in their habitual places of residence (supra Having Seen clauses 9 and 10). 18. That even though Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre and her four children are not in the Dominican Republic at present, the State must maintain the measures adopted in their favor with a view to making them effective when said beneficiaries return to their country. 19. That the Commission and the representatives have informed that Father Pedro Ruquoy left the Dominican Republic out of fear for his life and personal security (supra Having Seen clauses 9 and 10). Since Father Pedro Ruquoy is a beneficiary of the provisional measures granted by the Court, the State must offer whatever conditions are necessary so that, should Father Ruquoy return to the Dominican Republic, he can remain within Dominican territory and have his life and personal integrity duly protected. In this respect, it is appropriate for the Commission and the representatives to inform the Court on the current situation of Father Pedro Ruquoy, so that the Tribunal can timely assess the maintenance of these measures in his favor. 6 Cfr., inter alia, Matter of the Communities of Jiguamiandó and Curbaradó. Provisional Measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of March 6, 2003, Considering clause 10; Matter of the Peace Community of San José de Apartadó. Provisional Measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 24, 2000, Considering clause 8, and Matter of Giraldo-Cardona, Provisional Measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 5, 1997, Considering clause 5.