2 the supervision of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, to expedite the results of such investigations. 8. To require that the State of the Dominican Republic continue to follow up the investigations that its competent authorities have already initiated concerning Benito Tide-Méndez, Rafaelito Pérez-Charles, Antonio Sension, Andrea Alezy, and Berson Gelim. 9. To require that the State of the Dominican Republic adopt, forthwith, whatever measures are necessary to protect the lives and personal integrity of Father Pedro Ruquoy and Ms. Solange Pierre[1], witnesses at the August 8, 2000, public hearing. 10. To require that the State of the Dominican Republic and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights provide to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights detailed information on the situation of members of the border communities or “bateyes” who could be subject to forced repatriations, deportations or expulsions. […] 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 12, 2000, wherein it was decided: 1. To ratify the Decision of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of September 14, 2000 and, therefore, to require the State of the Dominican Republic to adopt, forthwith, the necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of Rafaelito Pérez Charles and Berson Gelim. 2. To require the State of the Dominican Republic to refrain from deporting or expelling Rafaelito Pérez Charles from its territory. 3. To require the State of the Dominican Republic to allow the immediate return of Berson Gelim to its territory, even making it possible for him to meet with his son. 4. To require the State of the Dominican Republic to continue the follow up of the investigations that were already initiated by the competent authorities with respect to Rafaelito Pérez Charles and Berson Gelim. 5. To require the State of the Dominican Republic, in its reports on the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on August 18, 2000, to also report on the urgent measures it has adopted in compliance with this Decision, 6. To require the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit remarks to the report of the State of the Dominican Republic within a period of six weeks after being received. […] 3. The Order of the Court of May 26, 2001, wherein it was decided: 1. To request the State of the Dominican Republic to maintain the measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its orders of August 18 and November 12, 2000, in favor of Benito Tide Méndez, Antonio Sension, Andrea Alezy, Janty Fils-Aime, For the purposes of this Order, the names “Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre” will be used to identify said person, who initially appeared as a witness in the hearing on these provisional measures and is currently a beneficiary thereof. We wish to note that in the text of other Orders of the President and the Court cited herein, the body of evidence and the briefs of the parties, she appears either as Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre or Solain Pie de Dandre or Sonia Pierre, and it is understood that these names refer to the same person. 1