9 1. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to maintain the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on August 18, 2000, November 12, 2000 and May 26, 2001. 2. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to adopt, forthwith, such steps as may be necessary to protect the rights to life and personal integrity of Ms. Solain Pierre’s four children. 3. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to refrain from arbitrarily deporting or expelling Ms. Solain Pierre’s four children from its territory. 4. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to treat the names of Ms. Solain Pierre’s children in a confidential fashion. 5. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to investigate the facts that prompted the adoption of these urgent measures, and, if appropriate, to identify those responsible and impose the corresponding punishment on them. 6. To call upon the State of the Dominican Republic to perform all relevant actions so that the measures of protection ordered herein are planned and implemented with the participation of the beneficiaries thereof or their representatives, in such a manner that the aforementioned measures are diligently and effectively executed and that, in general, they are permanently informed about any progress made in said execution. […] 8. The briefs of the State forwarded on October 18 and November 29, 2005, wherein, besides reiterating some of the aforementioned statements, it pointed out, inter alia, that: a) it does not object to the participation of beneficiaries in the planning or implementation of the measures; however, as to the participation of representatives, “it considers it an attack against its sovereignty”; b) with respect to the destruction of Berson Gelim's and Janty Fils-Aime's safe-conducts, it affirmed that they will be re-issued and that it will inform the Court about the outcome of the investigation into the relevant facts. It pointed out that communication between parties and authorities is necessary and that authorities are open to discuss and solve any setback that may endanger the efficacy of the safe-conducts; c) it has been more than three years since the beneficiaries of the safeconducts last contacted state authorities, and the Commission and the representatives did not denounce any violation against their human rights until October 31, 2005. It reiterated that it has complied with the provisional measures for more than four years, as well as its willingness to keep complying with them; d) Ms. Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre should file “a formal and serious complaint, with the names of claimants, defendants and the witnesses they claim to know” regarding the alleged facts against her, and e) “it is issuing relevant instructions for [the measures adopted by the President of the Court in his Order of October 5, 2005] to be effective”. 9. The briefs of the Commission submitted on November 2, 2005 and January 13, 2006, wherein it stated, inter alia, that: