50 not yet been carried out, including the confrontation of Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas with Isabel Cristina Moreno-Tarazona. The aforementioned document mentioned that on November 17, 2003 the Security Director of the Northern Region stated that Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas could not be transferred “due to insufficiency of funds.” Furthermore, it was also stated that on December 12, 2003, the National Penitentiary Institute stated that “the transfer of the inmate h[ad] been approved but, due to budgetary restrictions, it h[ad] not taken place.”97 97(98) On January 26, 2004, the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especializado para Delitos de Terrorismo), “[b]ased on the order issued by the National Chamber for Terrorism (Sala Nacional de Terrorismo) [on October 13, 2003 (supra para. 97(94)], ordered that the investigation stage be extended for 45 days so that the procedures requested by the Superior Prosecutor [on September 25, 2003 (supra para. 97(93)] may be adopted.”98 97(99) On February 2, 2004, Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas’ legal counsel filed a brief with the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especial para Delitos de Terrorismo), stating that the confrontation of the alleged victim with Isabel Cristina Moreno-Tarazona was not carried out because Ramírez-Rojas had not been transferred to the city of Lima.99 97(100) On March 12, 2004, the National Chamber for Terrorism (Sala Nacional de Terrorismo) granted a thirty-day term extension regarding the investigation stage so that the procedures requested by the Superior Prosecutor in his report of March 8, 2004 may be adopted.100 97(101) On March 17, 2004, the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especializado en Delitos de Terrorismo) requested, among other things, that the confrontation of Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas with the defendant Isabel Cristina Moreno-Tarazona be carried out on April 1, 2004, and that the post-mortem examination reports on various persons regarding the events occurred from 1987 to 1989, be requested to the appropriate morgues.101 97 Cf. Report of the First Special Provincial Court for Terrorism (Primera Fiscalía Provincial Especializada en Delitos de Terrorismo) of January 21, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, pages 5435 to 5457). 98 Cf. Final supplemental report of the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especializado en Delitos de Terrorismo) of January 26, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, pages 5459 to 5467). 99 Cf. Brief filed by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas’ legal counsel with the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especial de Terrrorismo) of February 2, 2004 (record of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume 1, appendix 18, pages 1849 to 1851). 100 Cf. Order to extend the investigation stage issued by the National Chamber for Terrorism (Sala Nacional de Terrorismo) on File 69-03 of March 12, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, page 5477); and report of the Third Special Superior Prosecutor’s Office for Terrorism (Tercera Fiscalía Superior Especializada en Delitos de Terrorismo), issued on March 8, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, page 5469 to 5475). 101 Cf. Order to extend the investigation stage issued by the First Special Criminal Court for Terrorism (Primer Juzgado Penal Especializado para delitos de Terrorismo) on File No. 500-03 of March 17, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, pages 5479 to 5487).