93. Based on these considerations of fact and of law, and without prejudging the merits of the case, the Inter-American Commission concludes that the petitions meet the admissibility requirements set forth in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention, and therefore, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES: 1. To find the case admissible for the purpose of examining the alleged violation of Article 8 (2) (h) of the American Convention, in conjunction with Articles 1.1 and 2 thereof. 2. Additionally, in light of the allegations put forward by some petitioners, decides that it will examine the alleged violation of Articles 5, 7, 8 and 25 of the Convention during the merits phase. 3. The Commission decides that the remaining articles invoked are inadmissible. 4. To notify the State and the petitioners of this decision. 5. To publish this decision and to include it in its Annual Report to the General Assembly of the OAS. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 22nd day of the month of July, 2011.(Signed): Dinah Shelton, President; José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez, First Vice-President; Rodrigo Escobar Gil, Second Vice-President; Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Felipe González, Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero, and María Silvia Guillén, Commissioners. 21