250. In view of the violations declared in this judgment, the Court orders the reimbursement to the Fund of USD 4,372,75 (four thousand three hundred seventy-two United States dollars and seventyfive cents) for the expenses incurred. This sum must be remitted to the Court within 90 days of notification of this judgment. H. Method of compliance of the payments ordered 251. The State shall comply with its monetary obligations by payment in United States dollars or the equivalent in the national currency, on the closest date to the payment, using the exchange rate published or calculated by a pertinent bank or financial institution, on the day closest to the day of payment. In the event that this is not possible, the State shall ensure that the funds are available domestically for a period of ten years. 252. In the event that the State delays in reimbursing the expenses to the Victim’s Legal Assistance Fund, it shall pay an interest on the amount owed that is equal to the banking interest on arrears in Mexico. X. OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 253. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, unanimously: 1. To accept the acknowledgement of State responsibility, in the terms of paragraphs 19 to 27 of this judgment. DECLARES, Unanimously, that: 2. The State is responsible for violating the right to personal liberty contained in Article 7(1), 7(3) and 7(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights, the right to the presumption of innocence recognized in Article 8(2) and the right not to be compelled to be a witness against oneself found in Article 8(2)(g) of the Convention, in relation to the obligation to respect and ensure the rights established in Article 1(1) of the Convention, as well as the obligation to adopt provisions of the domestic law established in Article 2 of the Convention, for applying the institution of arraigo to the detriment of Jorge Marcial Tzompaxtle Tecpile, Gerardo Tzompaxtle Tecpile and Gustavo Robles López, in the terms of paragraphs 120 to 157 and 166 to 168 of this judgment. By virtue of its acknowledgement of responsibility, the State is also responsible for violating the right to personal liberty contained in Article 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(4), 7(5) and 7(6) of the American Convention, with regard to the obligation to respect the rights established in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Jorge Marcial Tzompaxtle Tecpile, Gerardo Tzompaxtle Tecpile and Gustavo Robles López, in the terms of paragraph 22 of this judgment. 3. The State is responsible for violating the right to personal liberty contained in Article 7(1), 7(3) and 7(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights, the right to the presumption of innocence recognized in Article 8(2) of the Convention, in relation to the obligation to respect and to ensure the rights established in Article 1(1) of the Convention, as well as the obligation to adopt provisions of the domestic law established in Article 2 thereof, for applying pre-trial detention to 56