ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AUGUST 28, 2001 PROVISIONAL MEASURES LOAYZA TAMAYO CASE HAVING SEEN: 1. The December 13, 2000 Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the President”) wherein he resolved: 1. To require the State the State to adopt, forthwith, the necessary measures to effectively guarantee Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo’s safe return to her country, as well as her physical, psychological and emotional integrity, so that the provisional measures that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights may order in her case have relevant effects. 2. To require the State and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to report in detail, by January 12, 2001, on the situation of Ms. María Elena LoayzaTamayo, so that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights might make a timely decision. 3. To require the State to submit to the Court, by January 12, 2001, a report on the measures taken pursuant to operative paragraph 1 of this Order, so that the Court might take up the report at its next regular session, and to continue to file reports on those measures every six weeks. 4. To require the Inter.-American Commission on Human Rights to submit its observations on the reports filed by the State within thirty days of their notification. 2. The February 3, 2001 Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court”) wherein it resolved: 1. To ratify all the terms of the order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of December 13, 2000. 2. To order the State of Peru to maintain any measures necessary to effectively ensure the return to the country of María Elena Loayza Tamayo and her physical safety, mental health and moral integrity. 3. To order the State of Peru to inform the Inter-American Court of Human Rights every two months from the notification of this order about the provisional measures that it has adopted in order to comply with it. 4. To order the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit its comments on the reports of the Peruvian State to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within six weeks of receiving them. 3. The April 6, 2001 report presented by the State of Peru (hereinafter “the State”) which states the following in paragraph 11: […] under Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, provisional measures are to be adopted only in cases of extreme gravity and urgency. These measures are called for only when the premise of extreme gravity and urgency obtains, which is not so in this case.