26 B) Net weight of the sample: 1.5 grams[; w]hite powder: positive [for] cocaine 94.7% purity[; w]hite stone: positive [for] cocaine 95% purity[;c]onclusion: according to the amount seized in the official letter [.] 2 kilograms, the evidence is considered for trafficking. 43 Note: the evidence was destroyed during the analysis. 54(23) On June 19, 1997 the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela ordered that the process be forwarded to full trial, informing the parties so that the accusation could be formalized and the defendants could reply to the charges presented against them, respectively, within the terms of law. On July 25, 1997 the same court declared the partial nullity of the mentioned order, since in the process some of the evidence requested in a timely manner by the parties was not practiced.44 54(24) On August 4, 1997 Mr. Alfredo López Álvarez requested before the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela the reversal of the order of preventive detention issued on May 2, 1997 (supra para. 54(20)). On August 7, 1997 the referred Court considered the request presented by the alleged victim inadmissible, since the commitment order was considered according to law.45 54(25) On October 8, 1997 the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela considered preliminary informative stage concluded, opened the full trial and informed the parties so that they could make the accusation formal and reply to the charges, whichever the case.46 54(26) On April 6, 1998 the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela declared the first evidentiary period of ten days closed and the second evidentiary period of thirty days to furnish the evidence proposed in a timely manner and in form by the parties opened.47 54(27) On April 13, 1998, the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela, given the fact “the [a]mount, [q]uality, and [p]urity of the drug seized from the [d]efendants LUIS ÁNGEL ACOSTA [VARGAS], [SUNNY] LORETO CUBAS, AND ALFREDO LÓPEZ [ÁLVAREZ]” had been proven in court records “and the corresponding reports and expert assessments were duly established,” determined that the drug should proceed to be destroyed. On April 28, 1998, date established for the destruction, when “the two kilos of cocaine[,] evidence of the present cause, were being incinerated, the results of 43 Cf. opinion issued by the Office of the Public Prosecutor and signed by Messrs. Darlan W. Membreño, toxicologist, and Francisco J. Herrera A., regional director of Forensic Medicine, on May 14, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 161). 44 Cf. court order to move on from the preliminary proceedings to the full trial ordered by the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on June 19, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 207); request to annul the actions presented by Mr. José Luis Mejía Herrera on July 23, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 212), and ruling of partial nullity ordered by the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on July 25, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 213). 45 Cf. appeal for annulment presented by Mr. Alfredo López-Álvarez before the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on August 4, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 246), and ruling issued by the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on August 7, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 248). 46 Cf. ruling issued by the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on October 8, 1997 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 259). 47 Cf. ruling issued by the Sectional Court of First Instance of Tela on April 6, 1998 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, volume I, folio 306).