37 72. The Court deems it pertinent to set the amount of compensation for the respective item, in fairness, at US $40,000.00 (forty thousand United States dollars), to be distributed in equal parts among Emma Theissen Álvarez Vda. de Molina, Ana Lucrecia Molina Theissen, María Eugenia Molina Theissen and Emma Guadalupe Molina Theissen. 73. Bearing in mind the various aspects of the damages that have been discussed, insofar as it is pertinent and appropriate given the specificities of the case, the Court sets the value of compensations for non-pecuniary damages that must be paid to the victim’s next of kin, in fairness, as shown in the following table: REPARATIONS FOR NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGES Victim and next of kin Non-pecuniary damages Marco Antonio Molina Theissen (victim) Emma Theissen Álvarez Vda. de Molina (mother) Carlos Augusto Molina Palma (deceased father) Ana Lucrecia Molina Theissen (sister) María Eugenia Molina Theissen (sister) Emma Guadalupe Molina Theissen (sister) TOTAL US$100,000.00 US$55,000.00 Expenses for psychological treatment (future) Total US$100,000.00 US$10,000.00 US$55,000.00 US$65,000.00 US$55,000.00 US$55,000.00 US$10,000.00 US$65,000.00 US$55,000.00 US$10,000.00 US$65,000.00 US$55,000.00 US$10,000.00 US$65,000.00 US$415,000.00 D) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION (MEASURES OF SATISFACTION AND GUARANTEES OF NON-RECIDIVISM) Arguments of the Commission 74. The Commission appreciates the statement in which the State acknowledged its international responsibility for violation of Articles 1(1), 2, 4(1), 5(2), 5(2), 7, 8, 17, 19, and 25 of the Convention and for not complying with the international obligation set forth in Articles I and II of the Inter-American convention on Forced Disappearance (supra para. 13). With respect to measures of satisfaction for purposes of reparation, in turn, the Commission asked the Court to order the State to: a) conduct a serious and effective investigation on the victim’s disappearance, as well as to identify and prosecute all those responsible, whether direct perpetrators or masterminds. The State must complete the criminal proceeding initiated by the Procurador de los Derechos Humanos on September 25, 1999 before the Fifth Criminal Trial Court and allow the family access to the information on the case that is in the hands of the Procuraduría de los Derechos Humanos, as well as any other, additional information. In said investigation, the State must abstain from resorting to amnesty, to the statute of limitations, or to measures designed to eliminate responsibility;