40 institutions in charge of protection of “boys and girls,” as well as the intelligence files of the Armed Forces. If cases of adoption without the knowledge or against the will of the natural parents are found, the adopted individuals or their next of kin must be able to request review of said adoption. Pleadings of the State 76. The State, in turn, pointed out that: a) it will continue its obligation to identify those responsible for the facts stated in the petition; b) the representatives of the insurgent groups at the time should be invited to jointly acknowledge the acts together with the State and to apologize to the victims and next of kin, including the family involved in the instant case; c) with respect to the commemorative hall, it suggests that a State building be designated as the “Hall to safeguard historical remembrance of the domestic armed conflict,” and that in said hall there should be information on the victims of the armed conflict, with a special area for the minors who suffered violence or death during the 36 years of said domestic conflict in the country. This hall should be inaugurated with participation by representatives of the State, of insurgent organizations, and of civil society; d) the attitude of the delegation of the State during the public hearing should be taken into account, as the victim’s next of kin were able to freely give their testimony at said public hearing, and this constitutes a form of moral redress; e) it apologized to the victim and to his next of kin, as a first demonstration of respect, reparation, and a guarantee of non-recidivism; and f) the Court should take into account, in its due dimension, the act of justice and dignity expressed by the State on the basis of its international acknowledgment in the framework of the adjudicatory proceeding in the instant case. Considerations of the Court 77. In this section, the Court will decide on the measures of satisfaction that seek to redress the non-pecuniary damage, which are not pecuniary, and it will also order measures that are public in their scope or repercussions. a) Obligation to investigate the facts that generated the violations and to identify, try, and punish those responsible 78. The Court has found, inter alia, that the State violated Articles 8 and 25 of the Convention in combination with Article 1(1) of that same Convention, to the

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos