-9and the provision of medicines directly [….] The medical care received to date has been less than optimum, because it has been affected by the general shortcomings that characterize the health care services of the national system […. H]owever, these deficiencies have been rectified in part by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, by purchasing medicines that are out of stock in the national hospitals and conducting some tests in private health care institutions when necessary. But the provision of medicines has been slow and bureaucratic […,] and support accessories for special conditions, such as eye glasses and a walking stick, have not been provided.” “[A]lthough the State has been complying with paragraphs 197 to 200 of the judgment, as regards medical treatment, it has done so deficiently.” Regarding psychological treatment, “the State has not taken any measure or action to commence psychological care for the Serrano family, even though the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda has requested this in writing on several occasions.” “Since the State does not have an institution that provides psychological care to victims of human rights violations, Pro-Búsqueda has recommended the support of a private institution that offers this service. However, the Association, as a representative of the victims, did not undertake to evaluate their need to receive psychological care, as the State indicates in its report”; (g) Regarding the State’s obligation to organize a public act acknowledging its responsibility for the violations declared in the judgment and in reparation to the victims and their next of kin, “the public act was designed to present the first case resolved by the Inter-Institutional Tracing Commission […].” “[I]n his address, the Minister of Foreign Affairs never acknowledged the State’s responsibility for the violations committed […, but] merely ‘regretted’ that the events had occurred […;] nor did he apologize to the next of kin of the victims […,] so that the act did not represent a form of reparation for them. Indeed, the Minister of Foreign Affairs never addressed himself to the members of the Serrano Cruz family, who played no part in the ceremony”; (h) Regarding the obligation to pay the compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages, “in a note of March 29, 2006, the State informed the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda that it had opened bank accounts in a bank of the El Salvador financial system in the name of the Serrano Cruz sisters, in which it would deposit the amounts corresponding to each of them for compensation.” However, the payments to the members of the Serrano Cruz family have not been made; (i) Regarding the obligation to pay the amounts established in paragraph 207 of the judgment to the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda and to CEJIL for costs and expenses, “the State advised that it had opened a bank account in favor of the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda [….] However, this payment has not yet been made.” With regard to the payment to CEJIL “the Salvadoran State had delivered a cheque for the amount corresponding to expenses and costs”; and (j) Regarding the obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the reported facts in this case, identify and punish those responsible and conduct a genuine search for the victims, and to publicize the result of the criminal proceedings, “from the State’s report it is evident that the judicial authorities and prosecutors responsible for the investigations have not complied satisfactorily with this measure. The said report mentions just one procedure