100 nor impoverish the victim or the victim’s beneficiaries, and they must bear proportion to the breaches declared as such in the Judgment.163 203. In the light of the above criteria and the facts of this case, the Court will now analyze the claims asserted by the Commission and the representatives on the subject of reparations, so as to order the measures of redress. A) BENEFICIARIES 204. The Court will now determine which persons should be deemed “injured parties” pursuant to Article 63(1) of the American Convention and, as such, entitled to such reparations as the Court may decide. First, the Court considers Hugo Muñoz-Sánchez, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Marcelino Rosales-Cárdenas, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa, and Felipe Flores-Chipana “injured parties,” in their capacity as victims of the violations found to have been committed to their detriment (supra paras. 112, 116 and 161); accordingly, they are entitled to such reparations as the Court may establish for pecuniary and non pecuniary damage. 205. The Court also considers that the next of kin of the above-named persons, in their own capacity as victims of the violation of the rights recognized in Articles 5(1), 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention, in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof (supra paras. 129 and 161) are “injured parties.” 206. The victims’ next of kin are entitled to the reparations to be set by the Court for non pecuniary and/or pecuniary damage, in their own capacity as victims of the declared breaches of the Convention, as well as to the reparations set by the Court in their capacity as successors of Hugo Muñoz-Sánchez, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Marcelino Rosales-Cárdenas, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa, and Felipe Flores-Chipana. Consequently, in addition to the aforementioned ten victims, the following persons are deemed “injured parties:” a) next of kin of Hugo Muñoz-Sánchez: Antonia Pérez-Velásquez (wife), Margarita Liliana Muñoz-Pérez (daughter), Hugo Alcibíades Muñoz-Pérez (son), Mayte Yu yin Muñoz-Atanasio (daughter), Hugo Fedor Muñoz-Atanasio (son), Carol Muñoz-Atanasio (daughter), Zorka Muñoz-Rodríguez (daughter), Vladimir Ilich Muñoz-Sarria (son), Rosario Muñoz-Sánchez (sister), and Fedor Muñoz-Sánchez (brother); b) next of kin of Dora Oyague-Fierro: José Esteban Oyague-Velazco (father), Pilar Sara Fierro-Huamán (mother), Carmen Oyague-Velazco (aunt), and Jaime Oyague-Velazco (uncle); c) next of kin of Marcelino Rosales-Cárdenas: Demesia Cárdenas-Gutiérrez (mother); 163 Cf. Case of Goiburú et al., supra note 1, para. 143; Caso Montero-Aranguren et al. (Detention Center of Catia), supra note 97, para. 118; and Caso Ximenes-Lopes, supra note 6, para. 210.