71 128. The Court also observes that both the Inter-American Commission and the representatives identified several brothers and sisters of the executed or disappeared persons as alleged victims of the violation of Article 5 of the Convention. However, in several of those cases, the evidence produced was insufficient to enable the Court to establish actual damage to said next of kin. Accordingly, the Court only considers victims those siblings in respect of whom sufficient evidence was furnished. 129. In view of the foregoing, the Court considers that the State violated the right to personal integrity embodied in Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Antonia Pérez-Velásquez, Margarita Liliana Muñoz-Pérez, Hugo Alcibíades Muñoz-Pérez, Mayte Yu yin Muñoz-Atanasio, Hugo Fedor Muñoz-Atanasio, Carol Muñoz-Atanasio, Zorka Muñoz-Rodríguez, Vladimir Ilich Muñoz-Sarria, Rosario MuñozSánchez, Fedor Muñoz-Sánchez, José Esteban Oyague-Velazco, Pilar Sara Fierro-Huamán, Carmen Oyague-Velazco, Jaime Oyague-Velazco, Demesia Cárdenas-Gutiérrez, Augusto Lozano-Lozano, Juana Torres de Lozano, Víctor Andrés Ortiz-Torres, Magna Rosa Perea de Ortiz, Andrea Gisela Ortiz-Perea, Edith Luzmila Ortiz-Perea, Gaby Lorena Ortiz-Perea, Natalia Milagros Ortiz-Perea, Haydee Ortiz-Chunga, Alejandrina Raida Cóndor-Saez, Hilario Jaime Amaro-Ancco, María Amaro-Cóndor, Susana Amaro-Cóndor, Carlos Alberto AmaroCóndor, Carmen Rosa Amaro-Cóndor, Juan Luis Amaro-Cóndor, Martín Hilario AmaroCóndor, Francisco Manuel Amaro-Cóndor, José Ariol Teodoro-León, Edelmira Espinoza-Mory, Bertila Bravo-Trujillo, José Faustino Pablo-Mateo, Serafina Meza-Aranda, Dina Flormelania Pablo-Mateo, Isabel Figueroa-Aguilar, Román Mariños-Eusebio, Rosario Carpio CardosoFigueroa, Viviana Mariños-Figueroa, Marcia Claudina Mariños-Figueroa, Margarita MariñosFigueroa de Padilla, Carmen Chipana de Flores and Celso Flores-Quispe. X ARTICLES 8(1) AND 25 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) THEREOF (JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION) Arguments of the Commission 130. The Commission alleged that the State is responsible for violating Articles 8 and 25 of the Convention, to the detriment of Hugo Muñoz-Sanchez, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Felipe Flores-Chipana, Marcelino RosalesCárdenas and Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa and his next of kin. In particular, the Commission alleged the following: a) 14 years have elapsed since the events took place, and the State failed to comply with its duty to conduct an effective and proper investigation into the abduction, extra-legal execution and forced disappearance of the victims, thus violating Articles 8, 25 and 1(1) of the American Convention; b) the duty to investigate and punish human rights violations must be seriously undertaken by States and it requires that both the material and intellectual perpetrators of the facts violating human rights be punished. Certainly, failing to fulfill this duty does not only imply that there are no convicted persons in the case or that, despite all efforts, it is impossible to verify the facts; c) in relation to the initial investigations ordered by ordinary courts, the victims' next of kin saw to it that the notitia criminis reached different authorities by