47 this case, nor does this Court have powers in these proceedings to enter a declaration of nullity against such Supreme Court Judgment, notwithstanding the right of petitioners to file the legal actions afforded by law with competent authorities.”47 New investigations in the civil criminal justice system 80(67) After the fall of the administration of former President Alberto Fujimori-Fujimori, investigations have been carried out and proceedings have been initiated before ordinary criminal courts in connection with the present case, as it shall be outlined below: a) Complaint 001-2000 80(68) On October 25, 2000, the National Human Rights Coordinating Committee filed a complaint with the National Attorney General´s Office seeking punishment of crimes against humanity affecting both civilians and military members, including the events that had taken place in the case of La Cantuta. Among the accused were Vladimiro Montesinos-Torres and Nicolás de Bari Hermoza-Ríos. On November 17, 2000, their next of kin appeared in person at the Office of the Public Prosecutor and adhered to the complaint filed by the National Coordinating Committee.48 This complaint was identified with number 001-2000. 80(69) On February 1, 2001, APRODEH extended the criminal complaint to include La Cantuta crimes, pointing out further the involvement of Luis Pérez-Documet, among others. Said complaint was consolidated with complaint 001-2000.49 80(70) On September 13, 2001, the National Attorney General´s Office ordered the deconsolidation of proceedings concerning the La Cantuta events, and requested that the Metropolitan Special Investigation Division of the Anti-Terrorism Directorate handed over the findings of the investigation on the events that had taken place on July 18, 1992. On October 28, 2002, the law enforcement authorities sent their findings to the Prosecutor’s Office.50 No further steps following such filing have been documented. b) case 15-2001 A.V. 80(71) In June, 2003, and January, 2004, the Supreme Court of Justice rendered decisions that convicted the justices who presided over and dismissed the case brought against the alleged intellectual perpetrators of the crimes that had taken place at La Cantuta of the crimes of personal cover-up and criminal association. 51 47 Cf. Judgment of July 15, 2004, rendered by the Supreme Council of Military Justice (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 43(k), pp. 1683-4). 48 Cf. Request by the ad hoc State Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a criminal application against Vladimiro Montesinos-Torres, Nicolás de-Bari-Hermoza-Ríos and Luis Pérez-Documet, on the grounds of the crimes perpetrated at La Cantuta (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 42(d), pp. 1568-9). 49 Cf. Request by the ad hoc State Attorney General’s Office for the filing of a criminal application against Vladimiro Montesinos-Torres, Nicolás de-Bari-Hermoza-Ríos and Luis Pérez-Documet, on the grounds of the crimes perpetrated at La Cantuta (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 42(d), pp. 1569). 50 Cf. Request by the ad hoc State Attorney General’s Office to materialize a criminal application against Vladimiro Montesinos-Torres, Nicolás de-Bari-Hermoza-Ríos and Luis Pérez-Documet, on the grounds of the crimes perpetrated at La Cantuta (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 42(d), pp 1569). 51 Cf. Request by the ad hoc State Attorney General’s Office to materialize a criminal application against Vladimiro Montesinos-Torres, Nicolás de-Bari-Hermoza-Ríos and Luis Pérez-Documet, on the grounds of the crimes perpetrated at La Cantuta (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 42(d), pp 1545).