7 - - information on the current state and outcome of the extradition proceedings, whether pending or closed, in relation to the investigations and criminal proceedings commenced regarding the facts of the instant case, as well as a copy of all the actions and steps taken by the Peruvian authorities, or by the authorities of any other country, the records of which they may have, and a report on the current state of the investigations and proceedings which have been commenced and are pending in relation to the facts of the instant case. Furthermore, the Commission and the representatives were requested to file relevant documents showing the parentage, and if appropriate, the death, of those who were stated as the alleged victims’ next of kin in the application and in the brief of requests and arguments, regarding whom no documents showing their existence or parentage have been submitted. Furthermore, they were requested to inform the reasons why Zorka MuñozRodríguez was not included on the list of the alleged victims’ next of kin and, if appropriate, to forward the relevant documents showing her possible parentage or death. 34. On October 27, 2006 the organization Instituto de Defensa Legal del Perú (Peruvian Legal Defense Institute) filed a brief as amicus curiae. On November 24 of the same year the State filed its objections to said document. 35. On October 29, 2006 the State and the Commission submitted their final written arguments. On the following day, the representatives filed their objection to said document. 36. On November 1, 3, 10, 13, 20, and 24, 2006 the representatives, the Commission, and the State submitted information and documentation in reply to the request for evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the instant case (supra para. 33 and infra para. 66). V PARTIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LIABILITY 37. In the instant case, the State acknowledged its international responsibility not only before the Commission but before this Court as well, on account of which it proceeds to define its terms and extent. 38. In subparagraph b) of the press release issued by the Commission on February 22nd 2001, in the framework of the 110th regular session period, together with Perú (supra para. 9),”it compromised to admit responsibility and adopt measures to restore the affected rights and/or make amends for the damage inflicted in several cases, case 11045 (La Cantuta) among them.” 39. During the processing of the instant case before the Inter American Court, the State acquiesced in the “alleged facts but disagrees with regard to the legal consequences attributed to some of the aforementioned events;” it also “declared to the Court that it acquiesces partially in some of the claims of the Commission and of the representatives of the alleged victims.” 40. In chapter V of its answer to the petition, titled “Admission of facts by the State,” which it repeats in chapter III of its final written arguments, Perú has declared: The acts admitted by the State include: a) identification and previous existence of the alleged victims who are Hugo MuñozSanchez; Juan Mariños-Figueroa; Bertila Lozano-Torres; Roberto Teodoro-Espinoza;