V. CONCLUSIONS 50. The Commission concludes that it has jurisdiction to review claims filed by the petitioner on the alleged violation of Articles 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 7.2, 8.1 and 25, in accordance with Article 1.1 of the American Convention and that these are admissible under the requirements of Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. 51. Based on the above mentioned arguments of fact and law and without that implying a prejudgment of the merits, THE INTER AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, DECIDES: 1. Declare this case admissible with regards to Articles 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 7.2, 8.1 and 25, in connection to Article 1.1 of the American Convention. 2. the petitioners. 3. Notify this decision to the Colombian State and to Continue with the analysis of the merits. 4. Publish this decision and include it in its Annual Report to the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 5th day of the month of August 2009. (Signed) Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero, President; Víctor E. Abramovich, First Vice-president; Felipe González, Second Vice-president; Sir Clare K. Roberts, Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Florentín Meléndez, and Paolo G. Carozza, members of the Commission.

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3