5 a. Reestablish the situation until the conclusion of the process before the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of the Case of Luisiana Ríos et al. v. Venezuela, in which they are victims and parties, so that RCTV may continue operating normally as a television station, in the same conditions in which it operated before the execution of said measures; b. That it abstain from threatening or executing against said television station, as well as against all journalists, directors, shareholder, and employees of said social media, all form or action of arbitrary cancellation or non-renewal of the concession that allows it to operate as an open television station in Venezuela;” c. “That it abstain from any other action addressed to illegitimately restrict the freedom of expression and property and, in general, the human rights of those who enact the […] Petition; and finally, d. That it ratify in their totality the Provisional Measures previously ordered by the Court for [their] protection and that it once again order that the State comply with them completely. CONSIDERING: 1. That the State ratified the American Convention on August 9, 1977 and, pursuant to Article 62 of the same, it accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court on June 24, 1981. 2. That Article 63(2) of the American Convention states that: [i]n cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage to persons, the Court shall adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in matters it has under consideration. With respect to a case not yet submitted to the Court, it may act at the request of the Commission. 3. That in relation to this matter, Articles 25(1) and 25(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court establish that: [a]t any stage of the proceeding involving cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damages to persons, the Court may, at the request of a party or on its own motion, order such provisional measures as it deems pertinent, pursuant to Article 63(2) of the Convention. [w]ith respect to matters not yet submitted to it, the Court may act at the request of the Commission. 4. That Article 1(1) of the Convention enshrines the duty the States Parties have to respect the rights and freedoms acknowledged in that treaty and ensure to all persons subject to their jurisdiction the free and full exercise of those rights and freedoms. 5. That the State’s obligation to adopt the provisional measures ordered in the Court’s Orders mentioned are in force (supra Having Seen paragraphs 1 and 2). 6. That after the mentioned orders of provisional measures, the Inter-American Commission presented a case before the Inter-American Court seeking that the latter establish the alleged responsibility of the State for the violation of the rights to freedom of expression, to a fair trial and judicial protection of 20 people, who are also the beneficiaries of the provisional measures already ordered by the Court (supra Having Seen paragraphs 1, 2, 7, and 8).