-143- 1. The State violated, to the detriment of Juan Luis Escobar Duarte, José Leonel Escobar Duarte, Andrés Manuel Peroza Jiménez, Jorge David Martínez Moreno, Ricardo Bohórquez Pastrana and Ovidio Carmona Suárez, the rights to life, humane treatment and personal liberty embodied in Articles 4(1), 5(1), 5(2), 7(1) and 7(2) of the Convention, in relation to the general obligation to respect and ensure the rights, established in Article 1(1) thereof, owing to the failure to comply with its obligation to ensure these rights, since it failed to comply with its prevention, protection and investigation obligations, in the terms of paragraphs 111 to 153 of this judgment. 2. The State violated, to the detriment of Manuel de Jesús Montes Martínez, Andrés Manuel Flórez Altamiranda, Juan Bautista Meza Salgado, Ariel Dullis Díaz Delgado, Jorge Fermín Calle Hernández, Santiago Manuel González López, Raúl Antonio Pérez Martínez, Juan Miguel Cruz, Genor José Arrieta Lora, Célimo Arcadio Hurtado, José Manuel Petro Hernández, Cristóbal Manuel Arroyo Blanco, Luis Miguel Salgado Berrío, Ángel Benito Jiménez Julio, Benito José Pérez Pedroza, Pedro Antonio Mercado Montes, Carmelo Manuel Guerra Pestana, César Augusto Espinoza Pulgarín, Miguel Ángel López Cuadro, Miguel Ángel Gutiérrez Arrieta, Diómedes Barrera Orozco, José Encarnación Barrera Orozco, Urías Barrera Orozco, José del Carmen Álvarez Blanco, Camilo Antonio Durango Moreno, Carlos Antonio Melo Uribe, Mario Melo Palacio, Víctor Argel Hernández, Fermín Agresott Romero, Jesús Humberto Barbosa Vega, Benito Genaro Calderón Ramos, Jorge Arturo Castro Galindo, Wilson Uberto Fuentes Marimón, Miguel Antonio Pérez Ramos, Elides Manuel Ricardo Pérez, Luis Carlos Ricardo Pérez and Lucio Miguel Urzola Sotelo, the rights to life, humane treatment and personal liberty embodied in Articles 4(1), 5(1), 5(2), 7(1) and 7(2) of the Convention, in relation to the general obligation to respect and ensure these rights established in Article 1(1) thereof, owing to the failure to comply with its obligation to ensure these rights, since it failed to comply with its prevention, protection and investigation obligations, in the terms of paragraphs 111 to 153 of this judgment. 3. The State violated, to the detriment of the next of kin of the persons disappeared and deprived of life, the right to humane treatment, embodied in Article 5(1) of the Convention, in relation to the general obligation to respect and ensure this right established in Article 1(1) thereof, for the reasons set out in paragraphs 154 to 162 of this judgment. 4. The State violated, to the detriment of the next of kin of the persons disappeared and deprived of life, the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection, ensuring access to justice, embodied in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the Convention, in relation to the general obligation to respect and ensure these rights established in Article 1(1) thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 169 to 212 of this judgment. 5. The State did not violate, to the detriment of the next of kin of the persons disappeared and deprived of life, the right to freedom of thought and expression embodied in Article 13 of the American Convention, for the reasons set out in paragraphs 217 to 220 of this judgment.