privacy; and iv) an oversight mechanism to ensure that authorities comply with the requirement to update the register. 25 47. The Court appreciates the important steps taken by the State towards compliance with the operative paragraph in question. Nevertheless, the State did not present concrete information on the manner of implementation of the supplementary measures that the Court ordered to reinforce the Register of Detentions, nor did it specify whether the activities carried out by the armed forces would be included in the register. It is particularly relevant that the State submit detailed information and supporting documentation to assess if the four points outlined in paragraph 243 of the Judgment have been fully complied with. F. The State shall continue to implement training programs and permanent courses for the diligent investigation of cases of cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment and torture, as well as to strengthen the State’s institutional capabilities by means of training programs for the Mexican Armed Forces on the principles and rules governing the protection of human rights, including the restrictions to which they are subject, according to the Judgment (seventeenth operative paragraph) 48. The State reported that it has conducted training programs in various organs of its administration, as well as its military forces. In the Secretariat of the Navy (hereinafter “SEAMAR”), the State affirmed that “for the purpose of informing naval personnel about the limits that their activities as law enforcement agents should be subject to, the SEMAR and the International Committee of the Red Cross (hereinafter ‘ICRC’), have coordinated various training activities, among them: Workshop on the use of force administered in the First Naval Region (Tuxpan, Veracruz) from March 6-8, 2012, with 99 marines in attendance [;] Workshop on the use of force administered in the Second Naval Region (Ensenada, Baja California) from April 16-18, 2012, with 61 marines in attendance[;] Workshop on the use of force administered in the High Command Headquarters (Mexico, Federal District) from May 23-25, 2012, with 30 marines in attendance[;] Workshop on the use of force administered in the Fourteenth Naval Zone (Puerto Chiapas, Chipas) from July 10-12, 2012, with 44 marines in attendance[;] Workshop on the use of force administered in the High Command Headquarters (Mexico, Federal District) from August 1-3, 2012, with 30 marines in attendance[;] and Workshop on the use of force administered in the Sixth Naval Region (Manzanillo, Colima) from July 10-12, 2012, with 46 marines in attendance.” 49. The State added that “[in] conjunction with the trainings and academy classrooms, from October of 2011 to April of 2012, training modules on human rights were transmitted through the Red Satelital de Televisión Educativa [Satellite Television Education Network] (EDUSAT). These training modules were carried out in coordination with specialized personnel of the National Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter ‘NCHR’)]. Through this system, 30,709 individuals received training. On another note, on September 4, 2012, the SEMAR and the CNDH executed four Convenios de Colaboración para Capacitación a Distancia y Presencial [Covenants of Collaboration for Distance and In-Classroom Learning] on the subject of human rights, whose aim is to lay the foundation for collaboration and support between both institutions for the 25 Cf. Case of Cabrera García and Montiel Flores V. México. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 26, 2010. Series C No. 220, para. 243. 16