17. Finally, in view of all the foregoing, the Court requests the State to submit information that is current and as complete as possible with respect to the progress in the implementation of this measure of reparation. B. Obligation to, within the term of six months, issue the publications ordered (thirteenth operative paragraph) 18. The State indicated that: a) “[o]n June 7, 2011, the ‘Agreement by which the publication was ordere[d] of the [J]udgment rendered on November 26, 2010 by the [Court] in the case of […] Cabrera García and Montiel Flores v. Mexico’ was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation”; b) “[o]n June 7, 2011, the official summary of the Judgment was published in the newspaper ‘El Universal,’ and on June 24 of that same year, it was also published in the widely-circulated state newspaper, ‘El Sur Periódico de Guerrero’”; c) “[t]he [J]udgment, in its entirety, was published on June 7, 2011 on the website of the Ministry of the Interior. For its part, on June 24, 2011, the government of the state of Guerrero published the [J]udgment on its official website”; d) “[o]n June 16, 2011, the publication of the [J]udgment was transmitted via the broadcaster, ‘XEZV, La voz de la Montana,’ with coverage in Tlapa, Guerrero. Similarly, on July 1 and 7 of 2011, respectively, the summary of the [J]udgment aired via radio broadcast on ‘Radio Coral,’ covering Petatlan, and on ‘Soy Guerrero,’ located in Coyuca de Catalán, Guerrero”; and e) “[o]n August of 2011, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation published the [J]udgment in Volume XXXIV of the Semanario Judicial de la Federación [Judiciary Weekly Magazine] and in its Gazette.” 19. Based on the foregoing, the State “consider[ed] that it ha[d] complied with this requirement and request[ed] [the Court] to rule in this respect.” 20. The representatives indicated that, regarding the publication of the Judgment, “despite several delays in meeting the six-month deadline, [the Judgment] has been published in all the indicated mediums. Therefore, they request[ed] that the [Court] declare that this operative paragraph has been complied with.” It is important to point out that, in regard to the web publication of the Judgment, the representatives noted that “the content was uploaded on April 30, 2012,” and not on June 24, 2011 as indicated by the State in its second report dated December 20, 2012. 21. The Commission “consider[ed] it important that the State submit copies of the publications in the Semanario Judicial de la Federación [Judiciary Weekly Magazine] and the Gazette.” In addition, the Commission stated that “it hopes that, along with the information on the publications, the State provide information regarding the availability of [the] link [to the electronic address] for a period of one year.” Considerations of the Court 8