for whom the cheques and certifications of payment have already been prepared, had not come forward to collect their compensation. 51. Furthermore, in its report of May 9, 2011, the State indicated that it had been unable to contact seven people. However, in its latest report, it indicated that, on June 28, 2010, COPREDEH had received a special power of attorney granted by Dionicio Rodríguez Campos to his wife Elena López, and the State was taking the necessary administrative measures to pay her the compensation. In addition, according to new information provided by the representatives, three of the beneficiaries listed had already received their payment. Lastly, the State indicated that, since it did not have information on all the beneficiaries, it had arranged a meeting with representatives of FAMDEGUA on July 6, 2011, in order to compare information and seek support from the regional headquarters of COPREDEH to locate people who are still owed compensation. 52. Regarding the costs and expenses of CEJIL, the State reported that, in order to comply with this commitment, it had issued the corresponding cheque, but it was not accepted by the representatives owing to banking difficulties. Subsequently, talks were resumed with CEJIL to coordinate the transaction and the signature of the certification of settlement. Therefore, it would duly inform the Court and forward the vouchers confirming payment of the corresponding costs and expenses. 53. The representatives indicated that “last December 27, [2010, members] of FAMDEGUA accompanied the victims to receive the payments owed to them by the State, after submitting the required documentation.” However, they also indicated that they did not have “detailed information for each victim,” so they were awaiting the information from the State. On June 28, 2011, the representatives initially stated that “based on the information obtained by FAMDEGUA, 115 people — including Rodrigo Mayen-Ramirez — had received the payment corresponding to the compensation ordered by the Court.” In their brief of July 4, 2011, the representatives stated that, according to the “information obtained by FAMDEGUA, [they could] confirm that from May 9, 2011, to date, [five beneficiaries] have received the amount […] corresponding to compensation for non-pecuniary damage; but, at present, they did not have additional documentation to forward to the Court. Hence, according to the representatives, 120 beneficiaries have received payment of the corresponding compensation. 54. The representatives added that, in addition to the 20 deceased victims indicated by the State, two other victims had died: Rafael Barrientos Mazariegos and Meregilda Marroquín Miranda. The corresponding inheritance procedure was pending with regard to all the deceased victims. Moreover, of the 13 people who, according to the State, have yet to claim their compensation, FAMDEGUA indicated that some of them have already received the payment, without specifying their names. Lastly, with regard to those who have not been contacted, the representatives stated that contact details were provided to the State. Nevertheless, there were willing to provide the data again. 55. Regarding the reimbursement of costs and expenses, the representatives confirmed that, on December 27, 2010, the State had made the respective payment to FAMDEGUA. In the case of the reimbursement of costs and expenses to CEJIL, the representatives clarified that, in early 2011, they had informed “State officials that, receiving the cheque could compromise there safety during their working visit to 15