6 the abduction is simultaneously murder, though eventually it may end in that, in which case there will be concurrence of offenses. 17. In the foregoing paragraph I have mentioned elements that are interesting for some of the questions I made on occasion of forced disappearance. Obviously, the disappearance, which places the individual outside any possibility of continue living in the same conditions he or she was doing it, hinders the exercise- not the entitlement, which is different- of several rights and liberties. For example, the disappeared person can no longer participate in public demonstrations; freely express his or her thought in the media or even, in closed places; move from one place to another; receive the benefits of special measures acknowledged for children and adolescents; get married; administer and enjoy his or her property, among others. Could we infer- I insist: it is a question- that the plural violation of rights, such as the disappearance is, necessarily includes (and we should so declare) violations of the right to expression, freedom of movement, family, property, that the disappeared individual is not able to exercise precisely in light of his or her deprivation of liberty and access to justice? 18. These questions in relation to the violated rights due to the disappearance (which have still not been extended to expression, movement, special protective measures, property, and marriage and so on, but that could be cast on these, using the same logic) lead to think about the right to protection of life. It is noticeable that many cases of disappearance end in deprivation of life (and in this way the abduction ends, continuous crime and the murder appears, instantaneous crime) in the same way that many abductions end in the murder of the victim, which in turn, turns into the injured party of the murder: two conducts, two periods of time, two crimes (though some national texts mention abduction or rape "resulting" in murder, forgetting that the result of abduction is abduction - it is its nature-, the result of rape is rape and the result of murder is murder). 19. It seems evident that the forced disappearance ceases when the disappeared person is found or when the disappearance ends with the deprivation of life. The arbitrary deprivation of liberty and the deprivation of life cannot coexist, that is to say, exist simultaneously. Of course, the fact that the disappeared person is found or dies does not erase such violation. In the second situation- arbitrary deprivation of lifethere is a new violation that is added to the previous one: there will be violation of the right to liberty and violation of the right to life, but no aggravated violation - due to the death of the victim- of liberty. If a court assumes that the missing person has died