2 4. The briefs of April 20 and November 6, 2007 by which the State of Peru (hereinafter, the "State") referred to the status of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The briefs of November 13, 2006, January 22, March 29, June 11, September 17 and October 3, 2007, January 17, April 22 and October 21, 2008, by which the representative of the victims (hereinafter, the “representative) referred to the status of compliance with the Judgment. 6. The briefs of July 5 and October 5, 2007 and February 20, 2008, by which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Commission” or the “Inter-American Commission”) submitted the observations to the status of compliance with the Judgment. 7. The Order issued by the President of the Court (hereinafter, the “President”), on December 3, 2008 by means of which it convened the State, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission to a private hearing in order to received the updated information on the aspects pending compliance with the Judgment. 8. The private hearing held at the Court’s seat in San José de Costa Rica on January 19, 20092. 9. The briefs and the appendices presented by the State during the private Bering (supra Having Seen clause 8) by means of which it informed on the compliance with the measures ordered in the Judgment. 10. The brief of January 22, 2009, by which the representative presented observations to the report submitted by the State on January 19, 2009 (supra Having Seen clause 9). 11. The brief of April 30, 2009, by which the State presented new information on the status of compliance with the Judgment. 12. The brief of May 14, 2009 by which the representative presented observations to the information forwarded by the State (supra Having Seen clause 11). 13. The brief of June 16, 2009 by which the Inter-American Commission presented observations to the information forwarded by the State (supra Having Seen clauses 9 and 11). CONSIDERING: 1. That it is an inherent power of the judicial functions of the Court to monitor compliance with its decisions. 2 Pursuant to Article 62 of the Rules of Procedures, the Court held the hearing together with the following commission of Judges: Judge Cecilia Medina Quiroga, Judge Leonardo A. Franco and Judge Rhadys Abreu Blondet. To this hearing, there appeared: a) on behalf of the Inter-American Commission: Deputy Executive Secretary Elizabeth Abi-Mershed; Advisers Lily Ching Soto and Silvia Serrano; b) on behalf of the victims and their representatives: Javier Mujica Petit, Carlos Torres Benvenuto and Guillermo Álvarez Hernández, and c) on behalf of the State of Peru: Supranational Specialized Prosecutor, Delia Muñoz Muñoz; Deputy Superintendent, Sergio Espinosa Chiroque; Adviser, Carlos Cueva Morales; Technical Secretary of the Council of State of Peru and Ambassador of Peru in Costa Rica, Alberto Gutiérrez La Madrid.