5 8. That, based on the information provided by the representative (supra Having seen paragraph 4), the Court considers it advisable to maintain the provisional measures in favor of: Eugenia Judith Erazo Caravantes, Leonel Meoño, Carlos Miranda, Evelyn Lorena Morales, Dorcas Mux Casia, Víctor Catalan, Fredy Hernández, Olga Alicia Paz, Nieves Gómez, Paula María Martínez, Gloria Victoria Sunun, Dagmar Hilder, Magdalena Guzmán, Susana Navarro, Inés Menéses, Olinda Xocop, Felipe Sarti, María Chen Manuel, Andrea González, María Isabel Torresi, Celia Aidé López López, Jesús Méndez, Juan Alberto Jiménez, Fernando Suazo, Manuel Román, Mónica Pinzón, Maya Alvarado, Gloria Esquit, Carlos Paredes, Santiago Tziquic, Franc Kernaj, Lidia Pretzantzin Yoc, Bruce Osorio, Paula María López, Adder Samayoa, Glendy Mendoza, Jacinta de León, Pedro López, Claudia Hernández, Amalia Sub Chub, Anastasia Velásquez, Cruz Méndez, Isabel Domingo, Marisol Rodas, Luz Méndez, Magdalena Pedro Juan, Vilma Chub, Petrona Vásquez, Mariola Vicente, Joel Sosof, Ana Botán, Cristian Cermeño, Margarita Giron, Juan Carlos Martínez, Daniel Barczay and Evelyn Moreno. * * * 9. That the Court recalls that the State must comply with all aspects of the Court’s decisions in its Orders and report periodically on all the actions it has taken to protect the beneficiaries of the provisional measures (supra Having seen paragraph 1). The State’s obligation to report to the Court on how it is complying with the Court’s decisions is fundamental for evaluating the implementation of the measures ordered in this case. The Court also deems it necessary to indicate that the information and the observations provided by the representative are essential for understanding the situation of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and, if applicable, to be able to assess the implementation of these measures by the State.1 12. That, the State must submit information to the Court on any actions it has taken to comply with measures required by the Court in its Order of November 25, 2006 (supra Having seen paragraph 1). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS pursuant to the authority conferred by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 25 and 29 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To reiterate the pertinent elements of the Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 25, 2006. 1 Cf. Matter of Colotenango v. Guatemala. Provisional measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of September 5, 2001, eighth considering paragraph; Case of the 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Provisional measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 4, 2006, fifteenth considering paragraph; Matter of Colotenango v. Guatemala. Provisional measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 12, 2007, eighth and ninth considering paragraphs; and the Matter of Carlos Nieto et al. v. Venezuela. Provisional measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 3, 2007, fifteenth considering paragraph.