investigations, the State argued that this measure of reparation had already been complied with in the context of the proceeding processed by the Internal Control Office of the Public Prosecution Service. 228. The Court assesses positively the progress made to date by the State in order to clarify the facts. However, it notes that, in the context of the second investigation into the facts, the proceedings against the three police officers for the offenses of rape and abuse of authority against Azul Rojas Marín had not been declared null and void (supra paras. 76 to 80). 229. In light of the conclusions in this judgment, the Court establishes that the State shall, within a reasonable time and by officials trained in dealing with victims of discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation, facilitate and continue the extensive, systematic and thorough investigations required to identify, prosecute and punish, as appropriate, those responsible for the sexual violence and torture suffered by Ms. Rojas Marín, avoiding the application of discriminatory stereotyping and any act that could revictimize her. 296 C. Measures of satisfaction and rehabilitation C.1 Measures of satisfaction C.1.a Publication of the judgment 230. The representatives asked the Court to order, as a measures of satisfaction, the publication of the entire judgment and the official summary on the website of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, to be easily accessible by the public and available for at least one year. The State did not oppose the eventual granting of this measure of reparation, but specified that “the publication of the official summary of the judgment in a newspaper with widespread circulation in the department of La Libertad would be included in the publication in the national newspaper.” 231. The Court establishes, as it has in other cases, 297 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this judgment, in an adequate and legible font: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette; (b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a national newspaper with widespread circulation and in a newspaper of the department of La Libertad, and (c) this judgment, in its entirety, available for one year, on the official website of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights. The State shall advise this Court immediately when it has implemented each of these publications, regardless of the one-year time frame to present its first report indicated in the nineteenth operative paragraph of this judgment. C.1.b Public act to acknowledge international responsibility 232. The Commission asked that the State “hold a public act to acknowledge international responsibility” to apologize to the victims. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to organize “a public act to acknowledge international responsibility and to apologize” to Azul Rojas Marín and her mother, which should be “transmitted by local and national radio and television.” The State indicated that, if the Court found it internationally responsible for the acts of torture, “it would not contest the holding of a public act to acknowledge Cf. Case of López Soto et al. v. Venezuela. Merits, reparations and costs, supra, para. 278, and Case of Women Victims of Sexual Torture in Atenco v. Mexico. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs, supra, para. 338. 296 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, supra, para. 79, and Case of Montesinos Mejía v. Ecuador. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs, supra, para. 226. 297 60